This, in their view, leaves room for arbitrary interpretation of some key obligations under the international legal instrument that Russia and China propose.

View information about this program

View help for this game

But this view is simplistic.

This view has some truth.

I share this consensus view.

This view is seriously flawed.

The Inspectors share this view.

In Putin s view, the Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of its debts.

Now situated under the Director of BDP, it remains hidden from public view.

But this view misses the point.

The data clearly supports this view.

This is not a partisan view.

View filesystem starting from this folder

We do not share this view.

We share the view that this menace must be brought under control in order to protect the fragile democratization and the success of State building in Afghanistan.

Two dangerous corollaries emerged from this view.

But this view is no longer tenable.

President Mohamed Magariaf later confirmed this view.

There was some support for this view.

The Committee does not share this view.

With a view to enabling Representatives to extend a minimum of essential hospitality related to their functions, 500 per annum is included for each office under this heading.

This view seems intuitively correct, but is it?

Changes in China s financial conditions reinforce this view.

Despite its seeming plausibility, this view is wrong.

In this view, cutting deficits will be expansionary.

There are three serious problems with this view.

I, for one, do not share this view.

This defensive view of transatlantic relations is problematic.

Yet the evidence does not support this view.

This situation has not changed, in our view.

In the Committee's view, it would thus be an abuse of process for this claim to be addressed and it is inadmissible under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.

In the Committee's view, therefore, this claim under article 50 is subsumed by the author's arguments on the substantive Covenant articles and is by itself inadmissible, for incompatibility with the provisions of the Covenant, under article 3 of the Covenant.

Mr. Chairman, could you explain to us why the three or four items or paragraphs under these conclusions and recommendations appear in this report? We view this as prejudging the conclusions reached by the Disarmament Commission.

In view of the above, the BMS is reported under other funds rather than under General Fund and Working Capital Fund from the previous biennium.

You could view this as the number 65 one time or you could view this as the number 1 sixty five times, all added up.

Is this American eye view of Europe unfair? Perhaps.

Today, a growing number of Mexicans shares this view.

Unfortunately, this view is both too sanguine and naïve.

But a growing number of voices challenge this view.

But this view ignores the country s new political dynamics.

This view is not limited to the Chinese government.

But this was not its view at the time.

But this view is not without its own risks.

This may be Tifatul s personal view or the President s.