The State party has not contested this claim.

This claim is problematic, however.

This assertion does not withstand scrutiny.

Indeed, it seems inaccurate.

It is within this legal context that the Committee will examine the claim.

This allegation is based on the fact that foreign inspectors have carried out inspections of the Alpha Serengeti.

Accordingly, this claim is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Many people will doubt this claim.

There appears to be no evidence to support this claim.

For these reasons, the Committee concludes that this claim is inadmissible.

Iraq contends that Iran has failed to meet the evidentiary standard required to establish this claim.

The State party has neither contested this allegation nor given any justification for arresting the author without a warrant.

No criminal investigation has been opened by the military prosecutor's office.

Thus, the domestic courts had no opportunity to make any finding thereon.

But, though this argument is valid in principle, economic models show that this risk has only a moderate effect on the best policy.

Courts and prosecutor's offices

Public Prosecution Service

In this context, it is taken into account that the Prosecution's list of witnesses has usually been reduced during trial.

The Committee concludes that this claim is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Upon review of all documents submitted by the competing claimants, the Panel was unable to find any evidence that supported this contention.

Women in prosecutor's offices

President of the General Prosecution, Damascus

CAEO I think that claim is sometimes used unnecessarily or as a cheap shot.

This separate claim against Egypt was thus inadmissible ratione personae.

The claim is accordingly unsubstantiated and inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

In this context, it is taken into account that the Prosecution's list of witnesses has usually been reduced during trial.

Prosecutors must follow the evidence wherever it leads.

The State party argues that this claim is solely based on assumptions and that the author did not raise this point during the domestic proceedings.

This term was not newly invented for the Sullivan case, but was a term from existing libel law.

(iv) The Act on the Public Prosecution Office, which provides that the Prosecutor has a duty to oversee compliance by public administration bodies with laws and regulations, and to review the legality of binding regulations issued by public administration bodies.

By the way, I find Homer Groening's film presented a beautiful alternative to that very claim.

However, the jury not always agreed completely with the demands of the prosecution team.

MONUC brought its findings to the attention of the provincial governmental authorities and the military prosecutor's office.

The burden of proof lay with the prosecution, and it was not for the defendants to prove their innocence.

Pursuant to the Law on Gender Equality in BiH, Article 27 envisaged sanctions

This particular application of the legal provisions of CIPA, as the information available to the Working Group reveals, has also undermined the equal balance between the prosecution and the defence

This claim has thus not been substantiated for purposes of admissibility and is inadmissible, under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Accordingly, this part of the communication is therefore inadmissible as incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant, under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.

The Optional Protocol provides a procedure under which individuals can claim that their individual rights have been violated.

This claim had originally been raised in the book Amelia Earhart Lives (1970) by author Joe Klaas, based on the research of Major Joseph Gervais.

Numbers of cases recorded by the Public Prosecution Service

I don t know how to evaluate that claim, or whether we could have prevented those attacks in other ways.

So the Copenhagen Consensus Center asked Professor Christoph Böhringer and Andreas Keller of the University of Oldenburg to test this claim.

Thus, the Committee finds this claim inadmissible ratione materiae, pursuant to article 3 of the Optional Protocol.

His government then sought to pin the blame on the local prosecutor who had formally arrested the captain.