The Foundation appealed this decision to the Supreme Court, who eventually ruled against it.

The High Court ruled that it did not.

The Administrative Court in Cairo ruled in his favor.

The court ruled that Saddam committed genocide against the people of Halabja this was the first time the Halabja attack was described as an act of genocide in a court ruling.

A Federal court has ruled that the military tribunals system Star Chambers where evidence derived from torture is used against the accused can proceed.

A US court recently ruled that veterans rights have been violated.

The court rejected bail for Ms. Bakhmina and ruled that her detention should continue.

The court ruled that, ultimately, freedom to express one's thoughts, however generously conceived in a democracy, must be balanced against other values, such as reputation, honor, privacy, dignity, and equality.

In 2014, the Court ruled that imprisonment for defamation violates the right to freedom of expression.

The Court ruled that the issue was controversial and, thus, there is need for legislative involvement.

1980 The longest running court case in U.S. history, the Sioux Nation v. the United States, was ruled upon by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The court ruled that even if negotiations fail, teachers must end the strike by Thursday, December 13th.

The European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2008 that whistleblowing was protected as freedom of expression.

The Court ruled that the need for equality also concerns local councils and their allocation of funds.

Also, in September 2004, the Supreme Court ruled against publicizing complainants' identities in sex offences, following the conclusive acquittal of the accused (C.A.A 5877 99 Haim Yanos v. The State of Israel (28.09.04)).

The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the program was constitutional, citing a compelling state interest in racial diversity.

The French court ruled that there was not enough information to determine the cause of al Durrah's wounds.

The Court ruled that the affidavit of desistance should be considered as hearsay, and had no probative value.

On 26 April 2000, the Appeals Court Prosecutor ruled that there was no reason for lodging an appeal.

In 1993, the California Supreme Court ruled in favor of Toni Cassista who filed a lawsuit against Community Foods, a store in Santa Cruz, California when she was not hired because of her size.

Although the Court ruled that genocide had taken place, it decided that Serbia was not responsible under international law.

In March 2011, a Turkish court ruled that the actions of the Turkish government in Dersim could not be considered genocide according to the law because they were not directed systematically against an ethnic group.

A judge who had previously ruled against Tempo in Winata's civil suit filled her vacancy.

It was not until 26 June 1999 that the Constitutional Court ruled that a conviction by an appeal court following an acquittal by the court of first instance did not violate the right to review.

The court recently ruled that Nawaz Sharif, who Musharraf unseated eight years ago, must be allowed to return from exile.

Last May, Kuwait's constitutional court ruled that expressing one's opinions on foreign states cannot be considered as a hostile act .

In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court in the Diamond v. Chakrabarty case ruled that genetically altered life could be patented.

A different judge presided over the proceedings and ruled in favour of Waldemar reiterating the reasoning of the District Court.

On 27 April 2005, the court ruled that the prosecutor either had to bring criminal charges or drop the case.

On 2 September 2004, the Central District of Minsk Court ruled to dismiss a motion for release by Mr. Marynich.

Four days later, Mexico highest electoral court ruled that Fox had improperly interfered in the election but unanimously reaffirmed Calderon s victory.

The court ruled that under California law any rights of publicity, including the right to his image, terminated with Lugosi's death.

The Israeli High Court had ruled that the construction of the wall within Palestinian territory was justified as a security measure.

The court ruled that a series of social programs should be expanded, in order to provide a basic nutritional floor for all.

On July 12, the United Nation s Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled that Beijing s claims to the South China Sea have no grounds.

On June 11, 1987, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled 4 3 that the package served a public purpose and were therefore constitutional.

The federal court ruled that under the Geneva Conventions, Hamdan, as a prisoner of war, was entitled to a court hearing that followed the same procedures as one judging soldiers of the detaining power, that is, an American court martial.

Although Hamas has ruled this out, it has shown no hesitation to use heavy force against its opponents.

The court ruled in favor of the government on August 4, ordering police to take steps to restrict access to LinkedIn across the country.

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that some secret surveillance might be allowed during genuine emergency situations, but this is not unlimited.

A complaint was filed with the Peshawar High Court, which ruled in March 2004 that women cannot be stopped from exercising their political rights.

It was ruled by the Indonesian army, which fought a brutal civil war against the separatist Free Aceh Movement.

The court ruled against the right of the United States based animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals to exhibit posters that juxtapose photographs of victims of the Holocaust with photographs of animals in factory farms and at slaughterhouses.

Over against the twenty cubits which were for the inner court, and over against the pavement which was for the utter court, was gallery against gallery in three stories.

Court erupts cheating against the military regime. Screaming.