Responsibility to protect

The Responsibility to Protect Migrants

The Responsibility to Protect Libyans

Slovenia considers the responsibility to protect to be an integral part of national responsibility to protect a country's people against atrocities.

We must advance the responsibility to protect.

The responsibility to protect is one such guideline.

My first point concerns the responsibility to protect.

For our part, we believe in the responsibility to protect .

The responsibility to protect is a powerful norm of international behaviour.

In this respect, we embrace the concept of responsibility to protect .

The summit made a strong commitment to our common responsibility to protect.

We believe it is the primary and primordial responsibility of each State to protect its population and for that reason we fully support the concept of the responsibility to protect.

States did not have a responsibility to protect people from serious crimes but rather a responsibility not to commit them.

Ultimately, it is government s responsibility to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights.

First, Slovenia welcomes the outcome document's affirmation of the responsibility to protect.

Slovenia welcomes the affirmation of the principle of the responsibility to protect.

This Responsibility to Protect, or R2P, was enshrined by the UN in 2005.

We are proud of the responsibility to protect and of its Canadian lineage.

Canada's support for the principle of the responsibility to protect is well known.

The responsibility to protect is, of course, a reflection of our common morality.

States have a special responsibility to protect as well as to prevent armed conflict.

Responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity

America had a moral responsibility to protect the young people whom Obama had encouraged.

Not even the most passionate advocate of the responsibility to protect can pretend otherwise.

It is also consistent with humanity's responsibility to protect the sanctity of human life.

Another important outcome is our recognition of our collective responsibility to protect populations against atrocities.

At the center of this debate is the so called doctrine of the responsibility to protect.

The responsibility to protect is a distinct concept, carefully set out in the World Summit Outcome.

In our view, the concept of responsibility to protect should receive serious consideration on our part.

The State must assume the responsibility to protect and promote the well being of its people.

The concept of the responsibility to protect was adopted unanimously by the UN World Summit in 2005.

Not only is the credibility of the responsibility to protect principle at stake, but also its own.

We need consensus on the responsibility to protect people from genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State.

That is the foremost responsibility and right of any nation to protect the lives of its citizens.

And we are particularly pleased that the membership was able to agree on strong language on the responsibility to protect, which articulates for the first time universal acceptance of our collective responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.

We have been called upon to deal with new concepts, such as human security and the responsibility to protect.

We stress the need to continue consideration within the General Assembly of the concept of the responsibility to protect.

Or, more precisely, it makes the old responsibility to protect the weakest both more difficult and more urgent.

Five years on, our collective responsibility to protect, as highlighted by the outcome document, must not be ignored.

I believe that we must embrace the responsibility to protect, and, when necessary, we must act on it.

The Government is fully conscious of its responsibility to protect civilians, even in the face of difficult circumstances.

In addition, under enormous pressure, concepts such as the responsibility to protect and human security have been included.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State, and we accept that responsibility and agree to act in accordance with it.

Mustering the cross cultural political will to give the responsibility to protect real and consistent teeth will always be difficult.