The blame falls on the state.

Supervising the implementation of law, maintaining State security and protecting the rights of the citizens and the interests of the State.

(h) Benefits which the State of origin or the affected State derive from the activity

I'll call one country Country 1 and the other country Country 2.

Country 1 has a systematic advantage over Country 2 in infrastructures.

The State party's submission on admissibility

The State must comply with its obligations.

We'll be gambling on the future of this country.

If the transmitting State is to exchange information automatically with the receiving State, payors of income in the transmitting State must report automatically the relevant information to the transmitting State.

And for the sake of brevity, I'll call one country Country 1 and the other country Country 2.

Following up the enforcement of laws, safeguarding State security and protecting citizens' rights and the interests of the State

But this is the figures across the entire country.

The petitioner's comments on the State party's submissions

The complainant's comments on the State party's observations

State party's observations on the merits

Counsel's comments on the State party's submissions

The State party's submission on the merits

The primary responsibility is that of the State.

you may argue, Well, maybe Country A is China and Country B is India.

It is the highest court of the State in administrative, judiciary and public accounting matters.

The State must comply fully and promptly with these obligations.

Therefore, the transmitting State would have to transmit to the receiving State the relevant information codified by the TIN used in the receiving State.

The State party is reminded that the State's international responsibility is borne by the State at the national level even when violations have occurred at the provincial level

(b) Constitutes a breach of an international obligation of the State.

agreement on who are its citizens

Shame and disgrace to the courtisan flatterers of State Television.

The petitioners' comments on the State party's submissions

Petitioner's comments on State party's submission

State party's submissions on the merits

The State party has not contested this claim.

The State party's comments on the supplementary submissions

The complainant's comments on the State party's submission

The complainants' comments on the State party's submission

State party's observations on the admissibility and the merits of the complaint

Author's comments on the State party's submission

The State party's observations and the author's comments

Observations of the State party on admissibility and merits

Comments of the author on the State party's observations

The State party's observations on admissibility and the merits

The author's comments on the State party's submissions

Comments by the author on the State party's submissions

The authors' comments on the State party's submissions

The authors' comments on the State party's submissions

The cost of treating victims was borne by the State.

And which one is a democracy? you may argue,