They argue that only poverty reduction matters.

They argue that their communication is admissible.

They argue that current account balances reflect national savings and investment rates.

So, when central bankers argue that they are the only game in town, they are ensuring that outcome.

If they argue with you , say ' Allah knows best all that you do .

If they argue with you , say ' Allah knows best all that you do .

But proponents of phasing out access to incandescent bulbs argue that they know better.

And that those who argue concerning Our revelations may know they have no refuge .

And that those who argue concerning Our revelations may know they have no refuge .

Or you can argue that they are corrupt empire builders who dissipate a portion of the shareholders money that they control.

They argue that politicians can regulate and supervise without intermediate bodies that have some degree of autonomy.

Advocates of sanctions argue that they are having a crippling effect on the Iranian economy.

The economy, they argue, is always at full employment.

They argue that traders of commodity futures merely react to price signals that ultimately depend on market fundamentals.

They argue, contrary to Cheney, that torture is not the best way to keep us safe.

These crony capitalists argue that, if they are left alone to develop their assets, they will make the country prosperous.

They argue that they were part of a specific group of people granted certain rights, and then had them abolished.

Russia, they argue, should form partnerships with more dynamic countries.

In a forthcoming book, they argue that the collapse of advanced country growth is not merely a result of the financial crisis at its root, they argue, these countries weakness reflects secular stagnation in technology and innovation.

They allow the White House to argue that it means to undermine Iran s leadership, not its people.

They also argue that, given the banks irresponsibility, there is no quick way to promote sustained expansion.

Politicians who seek scapegoats might argue that they mean no harm to their targets, and that they are helping their societies to avoid worse possibilities.

The costs are evident, they argue, but what are the benefits?

This tactic worked once, they argue, and it will work again.

They argue that if the AKP comes to control the presidency, it may no longer pursue moderate policies.

As central banks venture farther into uncharted territory, advocates argue that at worst they will do no harm.

One could argue that politicians behave this way because they do not understand the economic nature of crises.

In any event, they argue that they have complied with their obligation, under the relevant jurisprudence, to raise the substance of a complaint.

Sami didn't want to argue with that guy.

Golubchuk s children argue that he interacts with them.

He might argue that he has to be.

Proponents argue that more TLDs would foster innovation.

One could argue that politicians behave this way because they do not understand the economic nature of crises. I disagree.

More to the point, they argue, there is no proof that Babur demolished a Ram temple to build his mosque.

Putin s and Medvedev s poll numbers are so high, many argue, that they don t need to care about a few dissenters.

They now argue that the simplest solution would be to expand that remit and make the ECB the de facto pan European supervisor.

The United Kingdom and Sweden argue that they cannot be made subservient to a central bank of which they are, at best, semi detached members.

They argue that articles 12 and 33 of the Constitution are not simply accessory provisions which, standing alone, have no substance they confer substantive rights.

Opponents argue that carbon pricing would hurt economic growth.

Defenders of these production methods argue that they are a regrettable but necessary response to a growing population s demand for food.

They could argue that action is not necessary in a specific case, but they would have to do so publicly, thus becoming accountable for their inaction.

Some argue that government is not good at picking winners. Some argue that it makes no difference whether a country produces potato chips or computer chips.

Lo ! ye are those who argue about that whereof ye have some knowledge Why then argue ye concerning that whereof ye have no knowledge ? Allah knoweth .

Lo ! ye are those who argue about that whereof ye have some knowledge Why then argue ye concerning that whereof ye have no knowledge ? Allah knoweth .

So the monetary authorities, they argue, must be in the pockets of powerful bankers.