Working in NGO coalitions, wording on these issues was drafted and suggested to government delegates. Some wording was adopted by the delegates and used in outcome documents or other documents.

The LWV suggested wording to delegates, some of which was used by the delegates in drafting text.

The Chairperson accepted that wording.

The following wording is suggested

Unfortunately, the wording used here is different.

The Chairperson suggested wording to that effect.

Her delegation therefore supported the proposed wording.

Among the delegations that favour an inclusion of a provision on vicarious liability of the shipper, some have commented on the wording of the text.

A discussion took place as to the wording of subparagraph (c), as some delegations maintained that not all officials of a State were authorized to provide information.

Attention must be paid to the effect of the actual wording of the Commentary if the wording is drastic, local courts might ignore the changes.

Several delegations supported the wording proposed in paragraph 1.

In some instances, such concerns resulted from an insufficiently clear and precise wording of the text. While in others, the articles still contained gaps, omissions, ambiguities and inconsistencies.

At the fourth session, the Chairperson suggested the following wording

At the fourth session the Chairperson suggested the following wording

At the fourth session the Chairperson suggested the following wording

(c) Drastic wording and far reaching statements should be avoided

Some written comments before the Commission sought to align the wording with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) definitions that had probably not existed when the Model Law was drafted.

The impact of the text was further weakened by ambiguous wording that made it unclear whether the use of all or only some types of mines should be curtailed.

She would like the wording of the resolutions to be checked.

However, his delegation was prepared to work towards more appropriate wording.

Mr. CHIKANDA (Zimbabwe) said that his delegation preferred the original wording.

In this context, an alternative wording to paragraph 14 could be

For paragraph 17, Sweden would like to propose the following wording

The wording of draft article 10 therefore seemed the most appropriate.

A few delegations have also discussed the wording of the provision.

Some delegations suggested adding wording about intention and duration the purpose of the disappearance should be to remove the individual concerned from the protection of the law for a long period.

Another participant suggested wording that would introduce the idea of due diligence .

He could accept the Secretariat's suggested wording the applicable rules of law .

The wording of draft subparagraph (b) fell short of the standard required.

Alternatively, he proposed the wording Where international conventions or the applicable law require .

Her delegation would take a flexible approach to the wording of the paragraph.

In this sense, the following remarks are intended to streamline the text where there seems to be duplication and to propose some alternative wording where the working group could not reach an agreement yet.

The precise wording of such an amendment could be left to the drafting group.

This exact wording is reflected in the United Nations Commentary, paragraph 11, second indention.

Furthermore, his delegation had strong objections to the wording proposed by the European Commission.

Mr. Mazzoni (Italy) said that he could accept the wording proposed by the United States.

In view of those arguments, several delegations supported the wording of article 2, paragraph 2.

This is clearly in contravention of the wording of article 13 ter of the statute.

While definitions vary in wording, they all fall within the conceptual framework offered in this definition.

Therefore, it is suggested that the relevant wording in UN Model article 26 be as follows

Language was agreed that reflected more closely the exact wording of the Convention for those titles.

Ms. MARRERO (Cuba) said that her delegation would like to be consulted on the new wording.

The President suggested that paragraph 2 should be replaced by the following wording Each State Party guarantees the right of victims of enforced disappearances to an effective remedy during the term of limitation. However, several delegations preferred the initial wording.

In the Committee's opinion, this wording confirms that the Convention's rights are not confined to article 5.

Spain is flexible as to the wording to be used to incorporate this idea into paragraph 16.