European leaders need to address these dangers.

European leaders must therefore take up two challenges.

How should the US and European leaders respond?

Valéry Giscard d Estaing had the best relations with East European communist leaders among all Western leaders.

European leaders must choose which one it will be.

I suspect that European leaders will not respond eagerly.

European leaders seem to be moving in this direction.

European leaders have already expressed reservations about Japan s moves.

Above all, European leaders must promote increased naval cooperation.

And European leaders, in their desperation, should not coerce the European Central Bank into helping.

No amount of money will allow European leaders to fudge this issue.

European leaders have responded with a cacophony of proposals for restoring confidence.

European leaders need to get serious about Europe s cocaine problem.

That was the situation faced by European leaders last autumn.

For variety, European leaders could take along Ron Chernow s biography of Alexander Hamilton.

The tone of stern warning has recently been adopted by other European leaders.

It is high time that European leaders take this promise seriously.

First, European leaders agreed in June 2012 on a major overhaul of the eurozone.

The Finnish initiative should be given strong support from all European leaders.

That is why European leaders took the ambitious steps that they did.

This is why European leaders swallowed hard and took their unprecedented steps.

Or public spending all European leaders adamantly want to reduce government spending.

European leaders have put in place mechanisms to support Italy and Spain.

The leaders of the European Union three and Iran met to seek a way forward.

Alas, it took another world war to convince European leaders of the validity of Keynes s approach.

This is what European leaders had in mind when they created the euro.

Second, European leaders did not feel the need to wait for the US.

Today, European leaders are unlikely to throw even that slender lifeline to Bush.

Its current economic malaise reflects European leaders prolonged efforts to deny the obvious.

Together, they form a compelling narrative that European leaders must begin to articulate.

To add insult to injury, current European leaders do not own their past decisions.

Unfortunately, another crisis or two might be necessary before European leaders consider it seriously.

Most European leaders understand the tiny wiggle room that Kerry will have if elected.

It has also been endorsed by some French (predictably!) and other continental European leaders.

In June 2012, eurozone leaders announced their intention to establish a European banking union.

But the trend toward normalcy among European leaders coincides with a remarkable absence of vision and strategy.

If European leaders do plan to meet in 2014 in Sarajevo, they should act now.

But realizing this promise requires European leaders to provide a vision and act decisively now.

But European leaders may not be bold enough to embrace such a plan in full.

The consequences of abandoning the euro are highly uncertain, and few European leaders are willing to go there.

During any negotiations with Cuba s leaders, European politicians and diplomats should remind their Cuban partners of their obligations.

Iran statement by the Presidency on behalf of European Union leaders meeting at Hampton Court, 27 October 2005

These European apprehensions partly reflect failure by the continent s leaders to capitalize on the sometimes spectacular successes of enlargement, Poland being the most notable example. Instead, the exigencies of domestic politics have induced many European leaders to underscore the difficulties and accentuate the failures of expansion.

In the second half of the century, farsighted leaders looked beyond revenge and gradually constructed the institutions of European integration.

Rather than focusing on shrinking the size of existing fleets, European leaders should focus on getting more out of them.