(a) who uses violence or threatens violence

Terrorists would not hesitate to threaten to use them or to use them.

According to this Law, domestic violence is any conduct by a family member who by applying force, threat or intimation causes bodily injury, emotional or sexual abuse and material, sexual or labor exploitation.

The Convention defines forced labour as all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily .

The working paper sets out the fundamental elements of an international convention on the non proliferation of weapons in outer space and the use or threat of use of force against objects in outer space.

Some observers remain unconvinced of the significance of the threat, and others criticize the prioritization of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats over other aspects of terrorism or types of threat.

Recognizing that the independence, territorial integrity and sovereignty of non nuclear weapon States need to be safeguarded against the use or threat of use of force, including the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Recognizing that the independence, territorial integrity and sovereignty of non nuclear weapon States need to be safeguarded against the use or threat of use of force, including the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, supra note 84, at para.

A threat to kill, causing health damage or causing significant damage to or destroying property, if there is reason to fear the realisation of such a threat, is punishable by a pecuniary punishment or up to one year of imprisonment.

Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Reports, 1996, pp. 241 and 242.

Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, supra note 84, at para.

The Bill also creates an offence of threatening to use any such material, devices or nuclear facilities.

6. Condemns any act of armed aggression or threat or use of force against peoples, their elected Governments or their legitimate leaders

6. Condemns any act of armed aggression or threat or use of force against peoples, their elected Governments or their legitimate leaders

7. Condemns any act of armed aggression or threat or use of force against peoples, their elected Governments or their legitimate leaders

They are coercive, but they fall short of the threat or use of military force. Will they be enough to stop the killing?

(q) Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

(q) Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

(q) Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

No reliance shall be placed in any statement established to have been obtained from an accused person or a witness under coercion or threats.

61 83. Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

62 39. Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

58 46. Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

57 85. Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

59 83. Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

60 76. Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

Major traffickers never come to trial because judges are bribed or intimidated.

Follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

Every country needs to feel the threat from North Korea, and thus to feel the need to participate in addressing it, regardless of their relationships with or attitudes about the US.

(i) Resolution 59 83 on the follow up to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

Threats of the use of nuclear weapons against another country constitute a violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 984 and the International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.

Sexual abuse is defined as actual or threatened physical intrusion of a sexual nature, whether by force or under unequal or coercive conditions .

Reaffirming that any use or threat of use of nuclear weapons would constitute a violation of the Charter of the United Nations,

(a) The obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force as embodied in the Charter of the United Nations

On the other hand, negative actions may be necessary, such as threatening to cut back on margin, or hold back delivery of product.

The definition, it will be noted, makes no reference to the principles relating to the legality of the use or threat of force.

Yet we have still not succeeded in arriving at a common definition of that threat or identified its fundamental causes.

Thus the section would cover those cases of sexual abuse of women by medical personnel in which force or threat of force has been used.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, written submission of the United States, p. 43 (20 June 1995).

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, written submission of the Russian Federation, p. 9 (19 June 1995).

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, written submission of France, p. 38 (20 June 1995).

The war on terrorâ s emphasis on military action merely increases the terrorist threat and makes the task of the intelligence agencies more difficult.