They have even led Israel to brutalize the Palestinian people with complete impunity and to reject all relevant international resolutions.

His country totally rejected the concept of the responsibility to protect contained in the document, since there was no guarantee that such a concept would not, as usual, be exploited by the more powerful countries.

The point is not to single out China.

In the same vein, it would continue to deny safe haven to those who financed, planned, supported or committed terrorist acts.

Of course, not all central bankers are to blame.

First, the United States justified the Israeli assault and blamed everything on Hamas, just as it used to pin all responsibility for whatever went wrong on Yasir Arafat and Fatah.

When all governments in the region reject extremism, there will be no place for extremists, and terrorism will wither away.

Until Europe rejects austerity in favor of a growth oriented approach, all signs of recovery will prove illusory.

You should have refused his offer.

Justice rejects intimidation and double standards.

Otherwise, whatever happens to them is their own fault.

Responsibility for the process must not be put entirely on the Kosovo Government's shoulders.

Everyone has a responsibility to keep our roads safe.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State, and we accept that responsibility and agree to act in accordance with it.

Today, Turkmenistan refuses to cooperate with Russia.

It should be dismissed out of hand.

Another commenter questioned the Minor Protection Law

You should have refused his offer.

He could have objected to that and his request would have been honoured.

Our inability to take charge and say to all these people bringing their money, Sit down.

Thus, it combines responsibility for past emissions and equal per capita rights.

Each State Party shall take the necessary measures to hold criminally responsible

Chinese leaders blame Taiwanese leaders for cross straits tensions, and blame the Dalai Lama for all that ails Tibet.

Germany, as the largest creditor country, is in charge, but refuses to take on additional liabilities as a result, every opportunity to resolve the crisis has been missed.

President Barack Obama s administration refuses to describe what happened as a coup.

1. Each State Party shall take the necessary measures to hold criminally responsible at least

The US would be wise to reject that view.

It has always encouraged all efforts towards the peaceful coexistence of peoples and has always firmly rejected provocations, violence and oppression of any kind.

To impose strict liability in respect of all significant damage therefore seemed very sweeping.

The principle of sovereignty means that responsibility for people lies with each sovereign country and its Government.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State.

Now, they refuse to fulfill their promises of global cooperation.

Behold, happy is the man whom God corrects. Therefore do not despise the chastening of the Almighty.

Yahweh, why do you reject my soul? Why do you hide your face from me?

My son, listen to your father's instruction, and don't forsake your mother's teaching

Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty

LORD, why castest thou off my soul? why hidest thou thy face from me?

My son, hear the instruction of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother

The Court was asked to dismiss the case for insufficiency of evidence.

Any step designed to hold Sudan s leaders accountable for their crimes is therefore most welcome.

Primary responsibility for safeguarding the rights and well being of all citizens lies with EU member states.

All those who fuel violence and block the implementation of the peace agreements must bear responsibility.

They presided over institutions that made large profits for a substantial period of time by mispricing risk, and then argued for public support on the grounds that they were too big to fail. They appeared arrogant and overpaid, and were easily demonized.

3. Rejects the identification of terrorism with any religion, nationality or culture

Nevertheless, the administration refuses to be held back by institutional restraints.