We encounter obstacles such as the rejection of the European Constitutional Treaty in two referendums.

The Constitutional Treaty includes guarantees to ensure that the EU adheres to this principle strictly.

Today, those in France who opposed the EU constitution succeeded in stigmatizing Europe as the threat.

In addition, the Constitutional Treaty gives citizens the right to ask the European Commission to take action on a specific point.

For all these reasons, the institutional reforms that are contained in the constitutional treaty are still urgently needed.

The EU ran aground two years ago when France and the Netherlands said no to the European constitution.

The disappearance from the treaty of such terms as constitution and minister of foreign affairs clearly show that the constitutional treaty s ambitions have been scaled back.

First, the Constitutional Treaty guarantees that the Union's institutions will respect the fundamental rights of everyone within the EU.

In Europe, the Vatican lobbied for acknowledgement of God in the preamble to the proposed European Constitutional Treaty.

As already proposed by the Convention, this would mean separating constitutional matters per se from Union policy.

That way, if a small minority of EU governments prove unable to ratify the treaty, it would not be torpedoed the way that its predecessor, the Constitutional Treaty, was in 2005.

On October 29, leaders of the European Union will gather in Rome to sign the Union's new Constitutional Treaty.

Even the constitutional treaty, which should have been a clarion call for all Europeans, was allowed to become bogged down in minutia.

In fact, the Constitutional Treaty defines more clearly which competencies should be shared between the EU and its member states, and how.

The importance and urgency of signatures and ratifications, without delay and without conditions and in accordance with constitutional processes, to achieve the early entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.

Such arguments were deployed successfully during the 2005 referenda on the Constitutional Treaty in France and the Netherlands, and in Ireland during the referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

But there will be no new initiatives on integration until leaders in the countries that rejected the Constitutional Treaty are ready for a new try.

Indeed, what Europe lost, first and foremost, with the rejection of the constitutional treaty is now obvious its faith in itself and its common future.

BRUSSELS In 2005, France and the Netherlands both voted no to a constitutional treaty for the European Union, derailing years of integration efforts.

Why this paradox? A vote that meant saying no to the Constitutional Treaty in 2005 now means saying no to the leaders of the French left and right.

Enlargement fatigue entered the European political lexicon in the wake of the dramatic failures of the French and Dutch referenda on the EU Constitutional Treaty in 2005.

Indeed, from the start, the architects of the Union's Constitutional Treaty never seriously expected that their draft would endure in the form in which they wrote it.

The solution to the impasse over Europe s Constitutional Treaty certainly does not lie in the direction of diminishing its scope, and thus perhaps making it just an ordinary treaty.

Unease about the EU s future is, of course, understandable, especially given the uncertainty surrounding efforts to revive the Constitutional Treaty.

Constitutional provisions

Constitutional Provisions Labour legislation does not discriminate against anyone on the basis of sex.

Constitutional Provisions.

However the Constitution also contains other articles, which significantly bolster the provisions of the Constitution relating to non discrimination.

Constitutional negotiations

Constitutional rights!

The war in Iraq did not delay the Union s big bang enlargement, and was not the reason for the failure of referenda in France and the Netherlands on the Constitutional and Lisbon treaties.

Members expressed alarm at the ruling of the Constitutional Court, especially in a country where the content of an international treaty became part of domestic law, once the treaty had been ratified.

The EU ran aground two years ago when France and the Netherlands said no to the European constitution. With the new agreement, the Union has once again started to move.

In sum, the Constitutional Treaty firmly enshrines fundamental rights in law, and also makes the EU more democratic, more transparent, and more effective.

Indeed, the older and more embedded democracy is in European countries, the more skeptical are their citizens towards the claims of the constitutional treaty.

Speaking at the London School of Economics on 28 February 2006, he said The rejection of the Constitutional treaty by voters in France was a mistake that should be corrected.

Constitutional acts

Constitutional and Administrative set up.

Article 26 of the Charter).

B. Constitutional and legal assistance . 80 82 22

C. Constitutional development

1. Constitutional amendments

(d) Constitutional justice . 97 101 26

(d) Constitutional justice

2. Constitutional assistance . 20 21 11