For those reasons, particular attention should be focused on those grievances and on their origin.

Finally, we agree that we should make significant institutional and functional changes to the Commission on Human Rights.

We agree to ensure the effective monitoring and enforcement of United Nations arms embargoes.

We agree that the world needs to be steered towards a greater focus on those larger freedoms.

With respect to nuclear weapons, we also agree that the non proliferation regime is at a critical point.

We all agree that development, in particular sustainable development, is fundamental to the achievement of international peace and security.

At the tournament s start, my girlfriends and I could not seem to agree on which team to support.

We agree that current developments and circumstances require that we urgently build consensus on major threats and challenges.

We agree that moving resources from one place to another cannot be the raison d être of a political entity.

We agree with the Secretary General that the summit should result in a number of far reaching and courageous decisions.

All of us (including cartoonists) agree that cartoons are a powerful tool of communication.

With regard to security issues, we agree that continued efforts are required to deal with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

We also need to agree on the agenda of the substantive session of the Disarmament Commission as soon as possible.

We agree with those who believe that we must improve conventional methods of fisheries management.

As for small arms and light weapons, we agree that they have an impact on aspects of the security and stability of nations.

We fully agree with the assessments that have been made, and we understand that difficulties are being encountered by the Commission.

It is very important to recognize that this reform of institutions is the next stage after agreeing upon ourselves that there is a clear ethic upon which we can build.

The first, I venture to say, is that we agree that the situation is not acceptable, that it is a bad one for the disarmament machinery as a whole.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State.

Without agreeing the terms of the debate, it is difficult to discuss these important issues.

This implies that AWF has a higher expected cost than RWT, because there are a lot of false positives and or the cure is worse than the disease.

Therefore, we agree that it is important to define and adopt criteria for the legitimate authorization by the Council of the use of force.

We agree with the Secretary General that

We must also all agree that cases of armed conflict, including foreign occupation, are governed by international humanitarian law and are in accordance with those rules and provisions.

Thus, we should agree on a new structure for the Security Council that would not necessitate further change for the foreseeable future.

And it seems like kind of an admirable philosophy at first something we might all agree to sign onto ...

We should agree on the comprehensive convention on combating terrorism without delay during this session of the General Assembly.

To minimize the risk of an unruly collapse, it is necessary to approve an international resolution mechanism with authority over all major international financial institutions.

Although both the Millennium Declaration and the outcome document have spoken of exploiting the beneficial aspects of globalization, we are yet to agree on and implement the modalities for such a process.

We must all agree that any targeting of innocent civilians, anywhere at any time, regardless of the reasons, constitutes a condemnable terrorist act that we must combat.

The summit should clearly reaffirm the commitment to the rule of law at both levels, and we must also agree on concrete measures to strengthen the rule of law in the daily work of the United Nations.

We agree with Rosemary Abi Saab

We agree that they merit a proper place in our system.

Why is this subject, Your Excellency? Didn't we agree to stop the subject?

The United States feels quite strongly that we could not agree to a comprehensive agenda that precludes, in some fashion, an internal review of Disarmament Commission operations.

We could not agree more.

We entirely agree with this.

Both Fish and Pinker agree that the sorts of objects indicated here can be described as part of what John Searle calls social reality.

Mr. Vassilakis (Greece) I believe that there is no doubt and that we all agree that the United Nations, and the Security Council in particular, are in need of serious reform.

We cannot agree with those who argue that an expansion would slow down the process of decision making and reduce the efficiency of the Council.

Whatever measures we agree on for implementation in the United Nations reform agenda must enjoy legitimacy and broad based support if they are to be effective and universally respected.

I believe that what the British presidency proposes is not a reopening of the debate on that subject we all agree that the concept will be refined, as agreed at the summit, within the framework of the General Assembly.

We will not always agree on all proposals, and we will continue to judge proposals on their merits.

We had hoped that far reaching and bold decisions would be ready for our common agreement at this Summit, in particular in the area of institutional change.

So, rather than embarking on a search for a European identity, we should agree on mutual educational objectives to increase the awareness of all Europeans of the others who are their brethren in Europe.