Finally, we agree that we should make significant institutional and functional changes to the Commission on Human Rights.

We should agree on the comprehensive convention on combating terrorism without delay during this session of the General Assembly.

We agree with the Secretary General that the summit should result in a number of far reaching and courageous decisions.

Thus, we should agree on a new structure for the Security Council that would not necessitate further change for the foreseeable future.

There are different perspectives on how Europe s security architecture should be designed, but we all agree on the urgent need to tackle this critical challenge through constructive dialogue.

We are therefore in agreement with the Secretary General that, in order to combine efficiency with legitimacy, the Peacebuilding Commission should report to the Security Council and the Economic and Social Council in sequence, depending on the phase of the conflict.

For those reasons, particular attention should be focused on those grievances and on their origin.

As noted above, we agree with the basic premise that the court should be conceived as a flexible, supplementary facility, based on consent.

We could not agree more.

We entirely agree with this.

We fully agree with the assessments that have been made, and we understand that difficulties are being encountered by the Commission.

The President of Senegal said earlier that if we do not reach an agreement on a formula, then perhaps we should repair the historic injustice by giving a position to Africa.

We agree with those who believe that we must improve conventional methods of fisheries management.

Without agreeing the terms of the debate, it is difficult to discuss these important issues.

So, rather than embarking on a search for a European identity, we should agree on mutual educational objectives to increase the awareness of all Europeans of the others who are their brethren in Europe.

Others question the efficacy of market based approaches to drive sustainability, because markets can never deliver optimal social and environmental outcomes.

We agree with the Secretary General that

We do not share this view.

In particular, as the Afghan authorities have emphasized and we agree with their assessment community based development and basic infrastructure are important areas that should receive high priority in the consolidation of peace in Afghanistan.

We may agree with Smith (and Shakespeare) about the uselessness of lawyers perhaps, but surely not about Olivier, Falstaff, and Pavarotti.

And it seems like kind of an admirable philosophy at first something we might all agree to sign onto ...

With respect to nuclear weapons, we also agree that the non proliferation regime is at a critical point.

We all agree that development, in particular sustainable development, is fundamental to the achievement of international peace and security.

All of us (including cartoonists) agree that cartoons are a powerful tool of communication.

We agree to ensure the effective monitoring and enforcement of United Nations arms embargoes.

With regard to security issues, we agree that continued efforts are required to deal with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

We agree that the world needs to be steered towards a greater focus on those larger freedoms.

We also need to agree on the agenda of the substantive session of the Disarmament Commission as soon as possible.

We agree with Rosemary Abi Saab

We could not agree more.

We agree that they merit a proper place in our system.

At the tournament s start, my girlfriends and I could not seem to agree on which team to support.

Why is this subject, Your Excellency? Didn't we agree to stop the subject?

We agree that moving resources from one place to another cannot be the raison d être of a political entity.

This implies that AWF has a higher expected cost than RWT, because there are a lot of false positives and or the cure is worse than the disease.

As for small arms and light weapons, we agree that they have an impact on aspects of the security and stability of nations.

Therefore, we agree that it is important to define and adopt criteria for the legitimate authorization by the Council of the use of force.

We agree that, in order to efficiently perform their respective mandates as provided under the Charter, the main organs should not duplicate their work with other bodies but should rather develop good cooperation in the common endeavour of building a more effective United Nations.

We agree that current developments and circumstances require that we urgently build consensus on major threats and challenges.

We agree with the observation that globalization creates both opportunities and challenges.

We should celebrate these achievements even as we recognize that serious problems remain to be resolved. There are different perspectives on how Europe s security architecture should be designed, but we all agree on the urgent need to tackle this critical challenge through constructive dialogue.

The first, I venture to say, is that we agree that the situation is not acceptable, that it is a bad one for the disarmament machinery as a whole.

It is very important to recognize that this reform of institutions is the next stage after agreeing upon ourselves that there is a clear ethic upon which we can build.

We cannot agree with those who argue that an expansion would slow down the process of decision making and reduce the efficiency of the Council.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State.