The authors argue that it thus appeared that the agent had never applied for review to the RRT as Mrs. Karawa had requested and paid for .

They argue that the notion of family in the Covenant is to be interpreted broadly, and that the relationship between the authors and their daughter clearly qualifies as such.

The authors argue that they have the freedom to impart information concerning their business in the language of their choice, and have been personally affected by the restrictions at issue.

The authors argue that the impact of logging operations are long term, practically permanent, and that the measures employed create new damage, exacerbate existing damage, and extent the area affected by logging.

5.2 On the merits, the authors argue that Vanessa, aged 14 and an Australian citizen since the age of 10, has lived all her life and undertaken all her schooling in Australia.

5.3 The authors argue that they did not refuse to introduce new evidence on the vulnerability of the French language and the visage linguistique of Québec to the Superior Court, on first appeal.

The authors contest the State party's objection on the absence of broader opposition to the introduction of the CKREE and argue that practically all religious and life stance minority groups in Norway opposed the subject.

On the issue of substantiation of claims, the authors argue that they have shown that the reductions of reindeer after the Ministry's decisions was a direct consequence of the impact of logging on pasture areas.

5.5 Thirdly, the authors argue that they have more than sufficiently supported their allegations, more than sufficiently identified the rights protected under the Covenant, and more than sufficiently described the conduct in violation of those rights.

The authors argue that their rights under articles 2, paragraph 1, 3, and 26 of the Covenant have been violated because they did not receive equal treatment in relation to the compensation paid for expropriated land property.

Authors

Authors

Finally, the authors argue that if this ground of inadmissibility were to be accepted, it would exclude almost all commercial expression from Covenant protection, as most people engaged in trade do so through the vehicle of a corporation.

Authors' Positions

Authors' comments

Don't argue.

3.2 The authors argue that they are victims of the above violations because of the general inability of Norwegian law to protect them adequately against the dissemination of anti Semitic and racist propaganda, and incitement to racial discrimination, hatred and violence.

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victims The authors

Comments by the authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Other authors are

Further comments by the authors

Additional information by the authors

The authors thus argue that if the State party's argument were taken to its logical conclusion, each author would have to make an application for every conceivable category of visa and exhaust domestic remedies on that application, prior to approaching the Committee.

It's useless to argue.

In this regard, the authors noted

He interviewed among others the authors.

The authors' petition commingles several theories.

Don't ever argue with the Devil.

The general background submitted by the authors

The facts as submitted by the authors

Who are your favorite authors?

Authors of communications 116 69.

Sami doesn't want to argue.

Sami didn't want to argue.

The authors regard this as sufficient substantiation.

Authors' comments on the State party's submissions

The authors' comments on admissibility and merits

Political contexts matter, the Israelis will argue.

Enter the job titles of the authors here.