This was the conclusion of the Supreme Court in the authors' case.

The authors opine that this could give rise to the avoidance of a permanent establishment by managing the contractual terms in cases where the circumstances would justify the permanent establishment conclusion instead.

Authors

Authors

3.4 The authors support this conclusion by referring to articles 8 and 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, although they regard these provisions as providing a lesser protection than the Covenant.

Authors' Positions

Authors' comments

But, as I have said in my debates with the authors, if one reads their paper carefully and thinks about the issues, one would see that there is no reason at all to draw such a conclusion.

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victims The authors

Comments by the authors

Alleged victim The authors

Alleged victim The authors

Other authors are

Further comments by the authors

Additional information by the authors

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

Conclusion

In this regard, the authors noted

He interviewed among others the authors.

The authors' petition commingles several theories.