History shows that doing so is both possible and necessary.

(Replacement parts for both engines are still in production and it is theoretically possible to assemble a new engine from the parts.

Is it possible for leaders to do both at the same time?

But the truth is that both parties are hiding from the reality without more taxes, a modern, competitive US economy is not possible.

Typically, bots perform tasks that are both simple and structurally repetitive, at a much higher rate than would be possible for a human alone.

So, response planning in the twenty first century is both possible and is essential.

Any such deal will be possible only if it responds to both sides interests.

Putin s consensus made it possible to resolve both problems without foreign assistance and interference.

Several outcomes are possible.

But both became countries with which it is possible to do a great deal of business, and both are increasingly integrated into the global economy. That may be the only realistic goal in dealing with Iran.

This is possible if we make greater use of the qualified, experienced human resources available nationally, which are available both inside and outside the beneficiary countries.

Many Russian futures are possible.

The possible conclusions are stark.

There are two possible routes.

There are many possible responses.

It is also possible to see in the politics of both parties mounting concern about globalization.

It also could alert both consumers and competition officials to the possible existence of a cartel.

The truth, of course, is that both are needed, and both are affordable.

It is possible to argue the economics both ways, but the politics all point in one direction.

We would like to thank people who worked hard to make this collaboration possible on both sides.

Both are broken.

Both are true.

The available air assets of both UNOCI and Licorne are being used for monitoring the borders, and measures are being considered for the possible collection and disposal of illegal arms found in contravention of the embargo.

Rationalist Rationalist theories of war assume that both sides to a potential war are rational, which is to say that each side wants to get the best possible outcome for itself for the least possible loss of life and property to its own side.

Decisions that go against Germany are possible.

a The earliest possible dates are shown.

IHL is weak as far as follow up and early warning mechanisms are concerned. It is therefore imperative to study possible institutional complementarity and mutual reinforcement between both bodies of norms.

Both are dangerously facile.

Both perspectives are misguided.

Both stories are flawed.

Both alternatives are unacceptable.

Again, both are misleading.

We are all both.

Such examples illustrate the possible dramatic side effects of DBS, but subtler effects are also possible.

Currently, both countries economies are thrusting confidently forward both are thirsty for more and bigger markets.

Both are important, and both require allocation of scarce resources that are increasingly hard to acquire.

Such negotiations will be possible if and when both sides Israel and the Palestinians form governments of national unity.

to ensure that we cover the need of the customer to the extent that we can ensure that both the coverage of the insurance and the prices are as correct as possible.

No moves are possible. Undo or start again.

Other possible approaches are under consideration as well.

Even more complex morphological changes are sometimes possible.

A meeting of minds on every global issue is too much to ask of both the US and Europe, but on many issues strategic convergence seems both possible and necessary.

The sisters are both blondes.

Both brothers are still alive.

Both solutions are extremely traumatic.