This document is submitted after the due date because all the necessary information was not available on time.

While there is room for improvement, the document offers some courageous and innovative solutions that are within reach, as long as the international shows the interest.

This document reports on the performance of all ofthe funds of the Convention for the biennium 2004 2005 as at 30 June 2005.

This document provides information on the deliberations of the Conference of the Parties (COP) since its second session on rule 47 of the rules of procedure (majority required).

On the other hand, UNMIK failed to submit its report by February this year, thus seriously breaching its obligations under this international document.

I hope that the promise of the draft outcome document will be realized through quick progress on the commitments contained therein.

In this document.

The present document is organized into two sections

The present document provides information on the steps taken by the Executive Secretary of the the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), as designated focal point for the International Year, for the implementation of the General Assembly Rresolution 58 211.

The combined initial, second and third periodic report of Tajikistan was received by the Secretariat on 5 May 2005.

The present document is submitted in accordance with that decision.

The present document is submitted in accordance with that request.

The content of the present document reflects that request.

The completed SAD is registered in the automated system.

The present document is submitted in accordance with that request.

The nuclear weapons States should provide this information in the form of regular reports under step 12 (article VI, para. 15) of the Final Document of the 2000 Review Conference.

For the General Fund for the ccore bbudget, the expenditures estimated to occur by 31 December 2005 are also presented, and on estimated expenditures through up to31 December In addition to the performance level, the present document gives information on programme implementation and the results achieved.

They are contained in chapters V and VI of the present document.

The communication is provided in the annex to the present document.

That information will be updated in the following document

Adoption of this document will provide us with a framework for action.

The communications are reproduced in the annexes to the present document.

This document was prepared pursuant to that request.

The paragraphs cited in the annex of the present document correspond to those contained in document A 59 5 Add.7.

The duration of this truce shall be six months, beginning upon signature of the present document.

Some of these issues will be considered further on.

Join the debate to improve the document.

The present document provides information on the following main areas

Programme Component F.2.4 Industrial Statistics 85

However, there is a need to strengthen the authority of the document.

This document was adopted in October 2003.

Critical Use Exemptions for Methyl Bromide for 2005 and 2006.

This document covers the implementation phase of the CEDAW in Mozambique.

Information was not available at the time of preparation of this document.

In advance, we will have copies available in the room.

The Principality of Monaco fully endorses the outcome document, and will support its implementation so that we can, together, achieve new progress in the coming months.

The information contained in the present document reflects information received after 5 April 2005, when document A 60 71 was submitted.

(Citations to some of this literature are found in the bibliography at the end of this paper.

This document outlines the ICRC's views on these issues.

There are some areas that the document does not address in detail, where many would rightly like to see progress during the sixtieth session.

Very limited progress had been made in the four years following the adoption of the Final Document and the practical steps for its implementation.

Jodl signed this document during a ceremony in France.

The submission of this document was delayed in order to include the most recent information possible.

This document was submitted late because of internal consultations.

Because competition agencies appear to have a comparative advantage over regulators when it comes to enforcing prohibitions of anti competitive behaviour and reviewing mergers, such agencies should have exclusive jurisdiction in those domains, or at least retain concurrent jurisdiction along with a regulator.