The debate moves on to an entirely different level, however, if the question becomes the permissibility of a given reservation under the treaty itself or under international law in general.

d The State party refers to the Committee's jurisprudence on this issue case No. 1 84, A. Yilmaz v.

However, the point at issue in that case was the inability of the claimant State to submit evidence showing any injury.

was arbitrary or reasonable in the circumstances of the case.

The majority of Committee members considered that there was no need to address the issue in the current case, without discussing its merits.

Or perhaps that is precisely the point.

1. A State cannot invoke immunity from jurisdiction in a proceeding before a court of another State with regard to a matter or case if it has expressly consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the court with regard to the matter or case

That wider question, which the authors' seek to present to the Committee through the lens of the Covenant, is the subject of current litigation in the State party's courts by the same counsel who withdrew the issue in the present case.

(a) If he has any personal interest in the case or

It is interesting to note, that while there was no consensus on the issue itself, there was a consensus on resolving the issue.

The Committee notes that the main issue in the penal case against the author was the assessment of his capacity to perform military duty, and that means an assessment of facts.

What measures were being taken or envisaged to address that issue?

(iii) Where completion of the case will entail difficulties, costs or trial periods which are not commensurate with the significance of the case and with the punishment, the imposition of which can be expected in case of conviction.

In the present case the Committee has ascertained, as it is required to do under article 22, paragraph 5 (a), of the Convention, that the same matter has not been and is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.

The Committee has ascertained, as it is required to do under article 22, paragraph 5 (a), of the Convention, that the same matter has not been and is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.

The matter of procedure, however, does not affect the right of termination or suspension.

This decision can in turn be appealed before the Federal Court of Appeal if the lower court judge certifies that a serious question of general importance is involved and states that question.

Which brings us to the second major issue at play here Sweden s Muslim population.

The matter was complicated, and his concern wasn t confidentiality.

Whether the firm or its shareholders and other stakeholders spent the money was beside the point.

When required, the ICTR is using the so called shift system , which ensures that one court room is used for two cases heard in morning and afternoon sessions.

When required, the ICTR is using the so called shift system , which ensures that one court room is used for two cases heard in morning and afternoon sessions.

But, if such talks were held more frequently, and the issue were addressed seriously (and repeatedly), surely progress could be made in overcoming suspicion on this question.

Furthermore, Japan believes that, should there be no progress made towards resolving the DPRK nuclear issue, the international community should deal with the situation in a more befitting manner and with a greater sense of urgency.

The capital expenditure costs are then amortized or depreciated over the life of the asset in question.

(d) The same matter is being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement

There would be nothing sensational about this if China were a country like Luxembourg or Singapore.

That issue is likely to continue to cause division, both within Europe and between Europe and Africa.

A determination of the case by the Committee at this stage would be prejudicial to the accused and or the prosecution.

The issue is what happens with these guys that actually indulge into playing video games like five hours per week, 10 hours per week, 15 hours per week.

The enforcement branch shall forthwith, through the secretariat, notify the Party concerned in writing of its preliminary finding or decision not to proceed.

Let us reserve our right to add any conditions or preconditions, because that might just complicate the whole issue.

Question of Palestine

(c) The same matter has already been examined by the Committee or has been or is being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement

The hard part is obtaining the fissionable materials plutonium or highly enriched uranium.

(g) The extent to which the same matter is being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement.

In the present case the Committee has ascertained, as it is required to do under article 22, paragraph 5 (a), of the Convention, that the same matter has not been and is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement, and that domestic remedies have been exhausted, as acknowledged by the State party.

In its decision on that case, after having assessed the value of the guarantees and finding no violation of the Convention, the Committee already dealt with the very issue raised by the present complaint.

8.3 While the State party acknowledges the Committee's findings on communication No. 777 1997, it submits that the present case should be held inadmissible because the same matter is being examined by the ECHR.

It would be beneficial if the two Governments built on steps taken in recent months regarding the issue and gave priority attention to developing and implementing a plan that would facilitate an early resolution of the matter.

This will ensure that (i) there will be no delay in trial preparations when the accused is surrendered to the Tribunal (ii) the case can be more readily assigned to a new Prosecution team if necessary or (iii) referred to a national jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 11 bis of the Rules.

The staff member shall submit a copy of the letter to the executive head of his or her department, office, fund or programme.

Canadians punish racial insults, but Americans do not, at least if the issue is simply one of protecting the dignity of racial minorities.

Historians and others who venture to break the silence are lambasted as traitors to the black cause.

A court which is to hear a case should not be involved nor seem to be involved in the preparation of the prosecution apos s case.