Decision making support mechanisms such as risk assessment and risk management, have been set up under these projects.

Risk evaluations conducted under different international bodies

Difference between risk evaluation requirements conducted under different international bodies

Under the Convention, the risk of third party litigation appears low.

As bureaucratic decision making became more risk averse, many large projects ground to a halt.

Under this item, the Council adopted decision 2005 312.

Under this item, the Council adopted decision 2005 312.

Under this item, the Council adopted decision 2005 231.

The decision to use one or two service providers should be taken after a preliminary risk analysis.

Under agenda item 13, the Council adopted decision 2005 305.

Under this agenda item, the Council adopted decision 2005 311.

Many migrants travel under appalling conditions, often putting their health and lives at risk.

Progress on the implementation of activities under decision 5 CP.7

Under agenda item 6 (a), the Council adopted decision 2005 224.

Under agenda item 13 (f), the Council adopted decision 2005 245.

Under agenda item 13 (g), the Council adopted decision 2005 310.

Under agenda item 14 (e), the Council adopted decision 2005 243.

Under agenda item 1, the Council adopted decision 2005 201 E.

By intervening in Lebanon, Europeans have made a far reaching, risk fraught, and, at the same time, correct decision.

(b) Progress on the implementation of activities under decision 5 CP.7

(c) Progress on the implementation of activities under decision 1 CP.10

Adopts the following decision under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention.

Adopts the following decision under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention.

Adopts the following decision under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention

Various communities continued to be at risk, particularly those under threat of attack or displacement and communities that were already displaced, or lived under blockade or under siege.

The draft decision on guidance for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol is attached to decision 23 CP.7.

Under present international guidelines it is assumed that any radiation dose, however small, presents a risk.

Food stored under unsuitable conditions should not be purchased or used because of risk of spoilage.

Under these circumstances, there was a risk that the Decade would fail to address human rights.

The Council shall notify the depositary of any decision taken under this article.

The Council shall notify the depositary of any decision taken under this article.

Under agenda item 3 as a whole, the Council adopted decision 2005 230.

Under item 5, the Council adopted resolution 2005 4 and decision 2005 223.

The majority of health experts agree that the risk of breast cancer for asymptomatic women under 35 is not high enough to warrant the risk of radiation exposure.

But, after eight years of America s self imposed isolation under Bush, it is a risk worth taking.

This under representation is most marked in decision making positions in trade and industry.

Under agenda item 11, the Council adopted resolution 2005 51 and decision 2005 304.

A score of more than 300 means that individual is at risk for illness, a score between 150 and 299 means risk of illness is moderate, and a score under 150 means that individual only has a slight risk of illness.

The technical and institutional links between adaptation to climate change and disaster risk reduction are under increasing discussion.

Risk mitigation activities and reducing the hazardous conditions under which a threat can materialize are the next step.

The International Olive Council shall notify the depositary of any decision taken under this article.

Under agenda item 13 (c), the Council adopted resolution 2005 13 and decision 2005 244.

Under item 2 of the agenda of its organizational session, the Council adopted decision 2005 213.

The draft decision on the guidelines for the preparation of the information required under Article 7 of the Kyoto Protocol is attached to decision 22 CP.7.

With the elaboration of a protocol, the Committee was eliminating the formal requirement for a statement of exceptional risk , but the element of risk as a condition for protection under the Convention remained.