As stated in paragraph 165 above, a request for information concerning the identity and evidence of authority to file a claim on behalf of a deceased person was issued in one claim.

As indicated earlier, nine claim files were transmitted to Iraq because the situs of all or some of the claimed losses was in Iraq, and one claim was transmitted to Iraq because the claimant claimed for losses relating to an invoice issued by an Iraqi party.

The claim was dismissed.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

They also included nine claims where the situs of all or some of the losses was Iraq and one claim where the losses related to an invoice issued by an Iraqi party.

This claim was hugely misguided.

In his response to a notification issued under articles 15 and 34 of the Rules, the claimant substantially re characterised his claim.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

Moreover, the method is vulnerable to illicit practices, such as collecting receipts issued to foreigners and students, who cannot claim their own refunds.

No warrant was issued for his arrest.

That claim was even more far fetched.

The order was issued by the highest judge.

First, the Panel noted that in some cases claimants clearly stated in their original claim submissions that they did not maintain audited financial statements, yet submitted audited financial statements in response to claim development notifications issued under the Rules.

However, there was no formal log of documents issued.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

A warrant arrest was issued against him and he was taken to prison.

A patent for this discovery was issued in December 1925.

The album was re issued by Reprise and Rhino Records.

Accordingly, this claim was not transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for substantive review rather, the claim fails.

A second installment was issued in January 1836, but the play was never completed.

This separate claim against Egypt was thus inadmissible ratione personae.

Claim No. 4002545 was originally in the E2 claims category.

Noting also that claim number 4002126 was thus filed as a consolidated claim in the name of Syndicate 1131 at Lloyd's,

Another fatwa (religious edict) was also issued to murder prominent politicians.

A cease and desist order was issued and a fine imposed.

As a result of the mission, a guidance paper was issued.

On 24 July 1990, he was issued a permanent residence permit.

The secretariat's review of the documents provided in support of this claim indicated that the claimant's D6 claim was complementary to, and not a duplicate of, his C6 claim, and therefore the deduction initially performed by the secretariat was incorrect.

He recalled the warnings issued by Syria and other States against the expansionist wall and the intentions of Israel, which in the event of a resumption of negotiations could be expected to claim that the wall was its boundary with any Palestinian entity.

This claim was initially part of Syria's fourth F4 instalment claim No. 5000457 for remediation of damage to agricultural and forestry resources.

In 2004, the Fort McKay claim was settled, involving 20,000 acres.

Thank God. The order to release my father was issued minutes ago.

He invented and was issued a patent on this press in 1795.

An evaluation mission to Pakistan was undertaken, and a preliminary report issued.

The Panel also reviewed each individual claim and its related E4 claim to ensure that there was no likelihood of duplication of awards.

The author's claim was thereafter dismissed and following the rejection of his claim, the author filed four successive motions in the Supreme Court.

Everyone could claim victory, and no one was obliged to acknowledge defeat.

Some sources claim that slavery was also non existent in ancient India.

In the appeal to the Supreme Court, his claim was similarly dismissed.

This claim unit was deferred from the second instalment of F4 claims.

Since the declaration was issued three days ago, over 8,600 have signed it.

No appeal was issued but several United Nations agencies provided immediate relief assistance.