The Chamber denied defence motions for judgements of acquittal at the close of the prosecution case.

Based on the premise that the Defence case will take as much time as the Prosecution case, a further 101 trial days will required for the Defence case.

Based on the premise that the Defence case will take as much time as the Prosecution case, a further 163 trial days will required for the Defence case.

The defence case, which was originally scheduled for 12 January 2005, had to be adjourned following the withdrawal of an assigned lead counsel by the Registrar.

A further 178 days will required for the presentation of the Defence case, based on the premise that the Defence case will take as long as the Prosecution case.

The Defence case will require a 180 trial days, based on the estimation that the Defence case will take as much time as the Prosecution case.

The prosecution case was completed in July 2005.

Based on the estimation that the Defence case is expected to take as much time as the Prosecution case, the four Defence teams will require 167 trial days for the presentation of their respective cases.

Based on the projection that the Defence case will require the same amount of time as the Prosecution case, the Defence will require a further twenty four trial days for the presentation of its case.

The Defence case started on 1 November 2005.

The presentation of the Defence case has commenced and proceeded over eleven trial days.

However, experience in previous multi accused trials shows that the presentation of the Defence case usually requires less time compared to the Prosecution case, due to less intensive cross examination.

On 3 October 2005, the Prosecution case started in the Zigiranyirazo trial.

The defence case is scheduled to commence on 1 November 2005.

The defence case was scheduled to commence on 10 May 2005.

The presentation of the Defence case has commenced and has since proceeded over fifteen trial days.

The defence case commenced on 31 January 2005, when the first accused opened her defence.

As a working tool, it is assumed that the time needed for the presentation of the Defence case should not exceed the time required for the presentation of the Prosecution case.

As a working tool, it is assumed that the time needed for the presentation of the Defence case should not exceed the time required for the presentation of the Prosecution case.

A further 117 days will be required for the presentation of the Defence case, based on the premise that the Defence case will take as long as the Prosecution case.

The Prosecution case is near completion and it is anticipated that approximately fifteen trial days will be required before the Prosecution rests.

Also, the Committee notes that the trial lump sum defence counsel payment system was a significant step in ensuring efficient trial strategy preparation by the defence.

The Trial Chamber also commenced trial in the Government case, involving four government ministers (Casimir Bizimungu, Justin Mugenzi, Jerome Bicamumpaka and Prosper Mugiraneza), and is approaching the end of the Prosecution case.

As the Court develops, the Registry must ensure that the administrative structures meet the Court's needs.

As a result of the decision of the Circuit Court, the case was remitted back to the first instance court.

In turn, full implementation of the decisions of the Court will enhance the role and credibility of the Court.

The composition of a court

Library of the Court

Rulings

The police dismissed an initial court order demanding that Biti be produced before the court.

At its seventeenth session, the Tribunal adopted editorial corrections to the Rules of the Tribunal.

The President of the Tribunal made a statement on the work of the Tribunal on that occasion.

The Circuit Court returned the case to the District Court for reconsideration.

The Chambers, Registry and Prosecution have continued to work together to find creative ways to increase the efficiency of proceedings at the Tribunal.

The Registry has, inter alia, prepared the Court's yearly budget submissions, issued policies and rules such as the staff rules, ensured finalization of the courtrooms, concluded a range of contracts and implemented a procurement plan for the Court.

(g) To cooperate with the International Criminal Court and to continue to cooperate with the International Tribunal for Rwanda

The Court meets in the United States Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. History The ratification of the United States Constitution established the Supreme Court in 1789.

Participant in consultation Court Prosecutor Court The Bar Prosecution.

I attended court sessions, in a specially provided prominent position in the courtroom.

Dying in Court

The court rejected the lawsuit.

Meetings of the Tribunal

Liability of the Tribunal

(c) The Court of the First Instance

Status of the operations of the Court