I started working on a motion.

... youheardtheevidence of the prosecution and the defense.

Based on the premise that the Defence case will take as much time as the Prosecution case, a further 101 trial days will required for the Defence case.

And that, my lord, is the case for the defence.

Hey, daddy, where does Sam Bowden hang out?

Based on the premise that the Defence case will take as much time as the Prosecution case, a further 163 trial days will required for the Defence case.

A further 178 days will required for the presentation of the Defence case, based on the premise that the Defence case will take as long as the Prosecution case.

The Defence case will require a 180 trial days, based on the estimation that the Defence case will take as much time as the Prosecution case.

The prosecution case was completed in July 2005.

The defence case will began in January 2006.

Barrister at Law, Honourable Society of Lincoln apos s Inn, London.

Based on the estimation that the Defence case is expected to take as much time as the Prosecution case, the four Defence teams will require 167 trial days for the presentation of their respective cases.

The Defence case started on 1 November 2005.

Based on the projection that the Defence case will require the same amount of time as the Prosecution case, the Defence will require a further twenty four trial days for the presentation of its case.

The presentation of the Defence case has commenced and proceeded over eleven trial days.

In the trial of Muvunyi, the defence case starts in November 2005.

However, experience in previous multi accused trials shows that the presentation of the Defence case usually requires less time compared to the Prosecution case, due to less intensive cross examination.

On 3 October 2005, the Prosecution case started in the Zigiranyirazo trial.

The Chamber denied defence motions for judgements of acquittal at the close of the prosecution case.

The defence case is scheduled to commence on 1 November 2005.

The defence case was scheduled to commence on 10 May 2005.

The parties have indicated that they intend to bring cases in rebuttal and rejoinder, after the close of the defence case.

The presentation of the Defence case has commenced and has since proceeded over fifteen trial days.

There has been considerable progress during the presentation of the defence cases in the Butare trial and the Military I case.

The defence case commenced on 31 January 2005, when the first accused opened her defence.

The Chamber heard 10 prosecution witnesses, making it the shortest prosecution case in the history of the Tribunal.

It's impossible for me to summarize the case for the defense since... the court never allowed me a reasonable opportunity to present my case.

As a working tool, it is assumed that the time needed for the presentation of the Defence case should not exceed the time required for the presentation of the Prosecution case.

As a working tool, it is assumed that the time needed for the presentation of the Defence case should not exceed the time required for the presentation of the Prosecution case.

A further 117 days will be required for the presentation of the Defence case, based on the premise that the Defence case will take as long as the Prosecution case.

According to the author, because of this situation, the pleadings of counsel before the court lasted no more than a few minutes.

The Prosecution case is near completion and it is anticipated that approximately fifteen trial days will be required before the Prosecution rests.

Change of defence counsel has delayed the commencement of the defence case, which will start by the end of October of this year.

2.3 The prosecution apos s case was that the author acted in common design with his brother and a third, unidentified, man.

23 December 1968 Admitted to practise as a barrister, solicitor and proctor of the Supreme Court of Western Australia and of the High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia

Also, the Committee notes that the trial lump sum defence counsel payment system was a significant step in ensuring efficient trial strategy preparation by the defence.

The defence case, which was originally scheduled for 12 January 2005, had to be adjourned following the withdrawal of an assigned lead counsel by the Registrar.

It aims at speeding up the process by which a Trial Chamber shall enter a judgement of acquittal on any count if there is no evidence capable of supporting a conviction at the close of the prosecution's case.

Mr. Goldstone was a barrister at the Johannesburg Bar from 1963 to 1980, before being appointed as a Judge of the Transvaal Supreme Court.

Spoken against violence, against incidents.

Against nothing.

I talk against violence, against terrorism.

For I came to set a man at odds against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter in law against her mother in law.

For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Denmark) and No. 33 2003 (Quereshi v. Denmark (No. 2)).