Nevertheless, the decision of Luis Moreno Ocampo, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, to request an arrest warrant against al Bashir is puzzling, for three reasons.

Mr. Ali filed a writ of habeas corpus in the Federal District Court in Chicago on 16 April 2004 challenging the constitutionality of the automatic stay provision.

Application for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court.

Even if the RRT had decided against them, they could have either pursued review in the Federal Court and subsequently the High Court, or alternatively applied directly to the High Court in its original constitutional jurisdiction.

We also support the Court's request for the establishment of an additional professional post in its Computerization Division.

There were measures in place to prevent and punish torture and ill treatment of detainees in prisons by law enforcement officers a detainee could make urgent application for a court order of protection, the swift action taken in the recent Maigrot case being a case in point and proof of the effectiveness of that remedy.

Application for leave to appeal denied by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Application for leave to appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Court did not acknowledge receipt of the motion to delay the hearing.

At the request of the Court or the Prosecutor, the United Nations may provide information and documents that are relevant to the work of the Court.

Since mid February, the Special Panels have issued 41 arrest warrants and denied 1 warrant request.

Any step designed to hold Sudan s leaders accountable for their crimes is therefore most welcome. Nevertheless, the decision of Luis Moreno Ocampo, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, to request an arrest warrant against al Bashir is puzzling, for three reasons.

Application for leave to appeal denied by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Lastly, her application to the Constitutional Court for amparo was also rejected.

The court also suspended the deportation order (decision of the court of first instance, case No.

2.6 On 26 October 1998, the first author requested before the plenary session of the Constitutional Court the annulment of the proceedings in the amparo application.

2.7 On 20 March 1996, the Superior Court of the district of Montreal allowed the deputy prosecutor's motion for dismissal and rejected the author's appeal.

The Ministry of the Interior appealed against this order, but the Court upheld it in a decision of 5 July 2004.

On May 29, the Supreme Court denied Beatriz s appeal.

(b) A juvenile as young as 8 can be requested to appear before the court

The Social Work Center is the only legitimate body to submit a request to the court for institution of a procedure for a temporary measure of protection from domestic violence, being obliged to obligatory submit a request to the court for protection of minors and legally incapacitated persons.

2.8 On 26 May 1997 the Constitutional Court rejected the application.

The grounds on which review may be sought and the powers of the Court are set out in the Act.

In February 2004, the President of the Special Court requested a second Trial Chamber.

One of the formal requirements for filing an application for amparo before the Constitutional Court is to have exhausted judicial remedies, and the author had referred to the violation of her right to use means of proof in the application for reconsideration before the High Court.

Pursuant to a request from judges Herrman and Mijnssen, they were heard by the Supreme Court in the absence of the author.

In August 1998, the author filed a motion for judicial review in the Prague High Court, as well as a complaint in the Constitutional Court.

In a judgement of 9 May 2001, the Constitutional Court rejected the appeal.

On 3 May 2000, the Supreme Court refused the author's application for leave to appeal.

Appeal cannot be made against the grounds for the judgement and is exceptional and confined strictly to form.

(a) at the request of the party against whom it is invoked if the court is satisfied that

3.3 The author did not make any application to the Constitutional Court for amparo.

The police have supported enforcement of court decisions on all occasions when support has been requested.

4.2 Regarding exhaustion of domestic remedies, the State party submits that, on 31 July 2003, the author requested the Copenhagen police to place the matter of revocation of the expulsion order before a tribunal, for review under section 50 (1) of the Aliens Act.

The complainant was not the subject of any national or international arrest warrant, nor a request for extradition.

It is good that the Court s decisions cannot be forecast, and even better that the Court cannot be lobbied or petitioned.

Clause 37 would enable the Attorney General to apply to judge of the High Court for an order of forfeiture in respect of terrorist property.

Mr. AMOR asked the delegation to clarify the competence of the Constitutional Court with regard to the interpretation and application of the law.

On 4 May 1990, the Supreme Court rejected the authors leave to appeal.

2.3 In a judgement dated 27 January 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the application for annulment.

The Tribunal's primacy in this matter was recognised by the Argentine authorities but those authorities wish to dispose of the extradition request of Serbia and Montenegro before they transfer Lukić to the Tribunal.

A decision taken under section 690 of the Criminal Code may thus be the subject of an application for judicial review to the Federal Court of Canada under article 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act.

Section 21 of the Act provides details of directives that may be given by the court in making a freezing of assets order.

The Court dismissed the appeal. In its view, the sub contracting agreement provided for arbitration upon the request of either party.

Pursuant to article 15, paragraph 2, of the Statute, the Tribunal shall form a chamber for dealing with a particular dispute, if the parties so request.