The promises are grand, but the actions have not measured up.

These are the right things to promise. But what will such promises mean?

Extradition shall be subject to the other conditions provided by the law of the requested State.

What is needed now is not more declarations or promises, but action action to fulfil the promises already made.

Submission details

Peril or Promise in North Korea?

Unfortunately, we failed to deliver on that promise.

(c) the actual place of delivery is one of the optional places of delivery under the contract and is located in a Contracting State, or

It declared that it would render cooperation on extradition on the legal basis provided under the Extradition Act of 1992 of Malaysia.

Applications for extradition were accepted in 12 cases.

Surveillance of deliveries

(a) Controlled delivery?

The time has come to act on those promises.

terms of delivery and payment

The Commission decided to include in its current programme of work one new topic, namely obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)

However, in such cases, extradition will be subject to other conditions set forth in Qatari law, if the State of Qatar is the requesting State.

So let us make sure we live up to our promises to the world's poor.

Despite the promises, aid continued to decline.

The many promises made have not been acted upon.

The latter, however, refused to accept that his old letter of resignation had any validity, let alone that Terzić had the authority to dismiss him.

Cyprus stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Egypt stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Latvia stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Malta stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

The Russian Federation stated that, on the basis of reciprocity, it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Slovakia stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

Spain stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Sweden stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty.

( 244) 430970

This increased transparency carries both promise and peril for the companies involved.

8. Extradition shall be subject to the conditions provided for by the domestic law of the requested State Party or by applicable extradition treaties, including, inter alia, conditions in relation to the minimum penalty requirement for extradition and the grounds upon which the requested State Party may refuse extradition.

Angola stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Jamaica stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Panama stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties. Paraguay stated that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) stated that the Convention would be taken as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition in relations between the Bolivarian Republic and other States.

Malaysia stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it did not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties to the Convention.

Politicians can make endless promises, but if the budget doesn t add up, politics is little more than mere words.

Grounds for refusing to extradite a person (article 493)

Providing for a definition of delivery is not that easy.

Bahrain stated that extradition was conditional on the existence of a treaty in Bahrain and that it took the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

Estonia stated that extradition was not conditional on the existence of a treaty and that it would take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.

What chance do we really have of keeping the promises made in 2000?

A second batch of F 16s commenced delivery in 2000.

But few people took those promises seriously.

But these promises are not sustainable.

This session of the General Assembly is not the time for more promises.

I signed the extradition papers.