We must agree on the Secretary General's counter terrorism strategy.

We agree that change must come, but also that it must come with increased effectiveness.

We agree with those who believe that we must improve conventional methods of fisheries management.

We agree that we must not lose our focus once we have moved past the emergency stage.

Because everyone must agree, nothing is agreed.

We must all agree that any targeting of innocent civilians, anywhere at any time, regardless of the reasons, constitutes a condemnable terrorist act that we must combat.

We agree.

We agree.

Now you must agree that I'm I must rely on other senses, right?

We agree that we must be ambitious in our work and ensure that the decisions taken at this year's summit are bold and irreversible.

We agree with the basic premise that further joint efforts to meet the MDGs must be based on the Monterrey consensus.

Whatever the case, it is clear that we must do things radically differently and in an accelerated manner. We must devise and agree to faithfully implement innovative and practicable measures to ensure that we reverse current trends.

But, too often, we hear commentators suggest that when Greenpeace and Big Business agree on something, it must be a sensible option.

We fully agree with the Secretary General's view that United Nations reform must be comprehensive and should not follow a selective approach.

We could not agree more.

We could not agree more.

We entirely agree with this.

We could not agree more.

We must agree on comprehensive, bold and action oriented reforms to strengthen the United Nations and adapt it to the world of today.

We agree with Rosemary Abi Saab

We agree that the Council will

There's a lot we can agree on.

Why don't we just agree to disagree?

We agree with the Secretary General that

The international community must agree on a more consistent and coherent approach to peacebuilding.

We also agree that, even if it would be preferable for action to be taken by consensus, that must not become an excuse for postponing action.

xronos2 I agree. We shouldn't mix religion with politics for they don't agree and then we would become a repressive regime like Iran

The international community must agree on stabilization targets for greenhouse gas concentrations beyond that date.

Before we address our ambitious plans to reform our Organization, we must first agree on a number of premises and basics to secure our path towards the realization of our common objectives.

We must push forward and agree on the modalities of the Peacebuilding Commission quickly so that it can be ready to work by 31 December 2005, as we pledged at the summit.

We agree that all forms of impunity must be effectively combated with regard to violations of international humanitarian and human rights law involving civilians in armed conflict.

We fully agree with the Secretary General that his report must be considered as a whole package, not as an à la carte menu from which we can pick only the juicy recipes.

We must also all agree that cases of armed conflict, including foreign occupation, are governed by international humanitarian law and are in accordance with those rules and provisions.

We agree with a phased approach to its reorganization.

We agree that stable funding is important for peacebuilding.

Whatever measures we agree on for implementation in the United Nations reform agenda must enjoy legitimacy and broad based support if they are to be effective and universally respected.

He said, he said, he said, 'We can't, we can't let nobody find out about this.' He say, 'You've got to help me.' I agree. I agree.

We must agree on sufficiently comprehensive recommendations aimed at, inter alia, reforming the current system of international trade and financial relations, and we must adequately rethink reform of the United Nations system in order to respond to the problem of development, which is undoubtedly our greatest challenge.

We agree with the view that ways must be found to ensure greater ownership and capacity among local actors to ensure a more acceptable, implementable and sustainable post conflict peacebuilding programme.

Although we now agree on the goal of democratization, without which there can be no true sustainable development, we must take account of historical and cultural factors when determining the pace of democratization in any given society.

We agree that Security Council reform is important and long overdue.

We agree that they merit a proper place in our system.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State, and we accept that responsibility and agree to act in accordance with it.

We agree that much more must be done for them to be attained, that time is of the essence, that action not rhetoric is required, and that what is done must be done better so that people can live in freedom from want.

However, before that can occur, all States must show true political will and agree that the implementation of the Protocol must be subjected to strict and continuous oversight.