We could not agree more.

We entirely agree with this.

Others question the efficacy of market based approaches to drive sustainability, because markets can never deliver optimal social and environmental outcomes.

We agree with the Secretary General that

We do not share this view.

We may agree with Smith (and Shakespeare) about the uselessness of lawyers perhaps, but surely not about Olivier, Falstaff, and Pavarotti.

We agree with Rosemary Abi Saab

We could not agree more.

We agree that they merit a proper place in our system.

Why is this subject, Your Excellency? Didn't we agree to stop the subject?

We agree with the observation that globalization creates both opportunities and challenges.

For those reasons, particular attention should be focused on those grievances and on their origin.

We fully agree with the assessments that have been made, and we understand that difficulties are being encountered by the Commission.

Without agreeing the terms of the debate, it is difficult to discuss these important issues.

We will not always agree on all proposals, and we will continue to judge proposals on their merits.

Finally, we agree that we should make significant institutional and functional changes to the Commission on Human Rights.

And it seems like kind of an admirable philosophy at first something we might all agree to sign onto ...

With respect to nuclear weapons, we also agree that the non proliferation regime is at a critical point.

We agree with those who believe that we must improve conventional methods of fisheries management.

We should agree on the comprehensive convention on combating terrorism without delay during this session of the General Assembly.

We all agree that development, in particular sustainable development, is fundamental to the achievement of international peace and security.

All of us (including cartoonists) agree that cartoons are a powerful tool of communication.

We agree to ensure the effective monitoring and enforcement of United Nations arms embargoes.

With regard to security issues, we agree that continued efforts are required to deal with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Finally, we fully endorse the need for an expanded Security Council that is more representative of the realities of today's world.

We agree that the world needs to be steered towards a greater focus on those larger freedoms.

We also need to agree on the agenda of the substantive session of the Disarmament Commission as soon as possible.

Here, we agree with the Secretary General's analysis, especially when he sketches the bleak and alarming picture that is Côte d'Ivoire today.

So, why is it, that if we think that we all agree that we need a better world, we need a more just world, why is it that we are not using the one language that has consistently showed us that we can break down barriers, that we can reach people?

We disagree with many of its contents, of course, but also oppose the idea of having an EU constitution at all.

This implies that AWF has a higher expected cost than RWT, because there are a lot of false positives and or the cure is worse than the disease.

As for small arms and light weapons, we agree that they have an impact on aspects of the security and stability of nations.

Therefore, we agree that it is important to define and adopt criteria for the legitimate authorization by the Council of the use of force.

In line with the spirit of Monterrey, we agree that there is a need to focus our joint efforts on finding effective, realistic and balanced development financing mechanisms.

We agree to eliminate references to enemy States in Articles 53, 77 and 107 of the Charter.

At the tournament s start, my girlfriends and I could not seem to agree on which team to support.

The first, I venture to say, is that we agree that the situation is not acceptable, that it is a bad one for the disarmament machinery as a whole.

We agree to support efforts through United Nations agencies to strengthen State capacity to implement sanctions provisions.

When we leave the house, we walk on the street and start to comment. We always agree on opinions, whether negative or positive.

We agree that moving resources from one place to another cannot be the raison d être of a political entity.

We agree with the Secretary General that the summit should result in a number of far reaching and courageous decisions.

Thus, we should agree on a new structure for the Security Council that would not necessitate further change for the foreseeable future.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State.

For we agree with the Secretary General when he says that no reform of the United Nations would be complete without the reform of the Security Council.

We agree that current developments and circumstances require that we urgently build consensus on major threats and challenges.