The proposal was adopted without comment.

That proposal was widely accepted.

Not surprisingly, the proposal was quickly shelved.

The proposal from Activity 6 was accepted.

There was no consensus on the proposal.

The latter proposal was accepted by the Chairperson.

With that revision, the Swiss proposal was adopted.

This was exactly my proposal in the consultations.

We can also say that there was an emerging consensus on my proposal at least on my proposal on the item on nuclear weapons before the NAM proposal arose.

The proposal was approved by the Committee without a vote.

The proposal was not discussed by the Ad Hoc Committee.

Concerning the substance of the proposal, several delegations confirmed that there was great merit in considering the proposal by Costa Rica.

Concerning the substance of the proposal, several delegations confirmed that there was great merit in considering the proposal by Costa Rica.

The proposal was adopted unanimously by parliament on 16 June 2010.

Despite lobbying by proponents, in December 2012, the proposal was rejected.

By then Sebastian was already 18 years old and his proposal was rejected.

Hollande s proposal was initially regarded as lèse majesté against Germany.

Support was expressed for proposal A, on knowledge management networks.

Support was also expressed for proposal B, on gender mainstreaming.

This proposal was accepted by Tugu on 14 October 1999.

Mr. Mitrović (Serbia and Montenegro) said that the German proposal was valid.

The proposal was rejected by 5 votes to 3, with 17 abstentions.

A proposal is included in the draft that was circulated this morning.

No proposal was submitted and no action was taken under sub item 97 (aa).

On a technical level this proposal was very different from the system that was finally realised.

The proposal was not approved instead, women's committees were formed within the ministries.

The Chairman I believe it was clear that there was no consensus on my nuclear disarmament proposal.

This proposal was received poorly by many of the Arab Israeli community leaders.

The proposal passed on 16 June was not a piece of final legislation.

That is my proposal and, as I said, that proposal was based on the fact that I culled it from the last resolution of the General Assembly.

A proposal for prior notification of space launches was also presented, which was further developed elsewhere.

Similarly, there was one objection only one to my nuclear disarmament proposal.

Twitter was ablaze with lots of opposition to and some support for the proposal.

A proposal was formulated which called for the creation of a virtual working group.

No proposal whether to delete article 29 as unnecessary was made in the questionnaire.

The proposal generated interest. A demonstration program was adopted in the United States in 2002.

The proposal was revised and submitted to the EU for a second time in 2004.

The proposal was presented along with another proposal, COM(2007)638, which includes a simplified application procedure and a common set of rights for legal third country workers.

It was noted that the proposal contained interesting ideas and that there was room for improvement in the thematic debate.

However, due to time constraints, it was not possible to discuss this proposal.

The proposal to use local materials and contractors to construct hardwall accommodations was also welcome.

Slovakia was very much in favour of the proposal to set up a Peacebuilding Commission.

The proposal was carried out by a vote of 15 to 1 with one abstention.

It is worth recalling that the A 5 proposal was introduced as open for amendments.

Birgitta Jónsdóttir from The Movement was the chief sponsor of the proposal, 19 other MPs (out of 63) from all parties in the parliament supported the proposal by co sponsoring it.