Such an outcome would make a mockery of democracy.

I think that is the first conclusion that emerges from this debate.

But this is the end result.

But that ambitious outcome is easier described than achieved.

This is the result that has been replicated over and over again.

China might not be happy with the result.

Perhaps that outcome was foreordained.

Indeed, that outcome appears likely.

The numbers seem to bear that out.

China finds this outcome regrettable.

At first glance, this was a rational and predictable outcome.

Few doubt that they will be.

But even this is almost surely better than a depression.

Even some in the Vatican feared this outcome.

Realistically, however, the potential for achieving such an outcome is limited.

It would be a big mistake to let that happen.

The researchers were able to replicate this particular result in four other populations.

In terms of broader effectiveness and quality issues, this finding was very important.

But this is not the only consequence of financial Dutch Disease.

What went wrong?

This result should come as no surprise.

As a result, communication on these issues has improved.

If that was supposed to be a better outcome than an earlier termination of the pregnancy, it is hard to see for whom it was better.

But it will take strong leadership by the president elect to avoid it.

Is that outcome morally superior to a bailout?

Fortunately, this has not been the case.

This outcome does not reflect a deliberate plan, but rather a series of policy mistakes.

This result was confirmed again in a second experiment in November 2011.

The result is the stable region that the world sees today.

But such an outcome remains in doubt.

There is no need for an election to determine that.

Such an outcome would be a major breakthrough for Cyprus and the region.

China has no interest in such an outcome.

There are two hopes for avoiding this disastrous outcome.

And it is even more unusual to have two distinct developments leading to such an outcome.

Most Russians reached this conclusion long before the Beslan attack.

But Americans are more than ready for this outcome no preparation is needed.

If anything, we are only in the early stages of that revolution, and the outcome remains uncertain.

Such an outcome remains possible, especially if the rebellions fail and more oppression follows.

But it was not possible to reach that conclusion on the basis of examination of her situation.

Such a consequence would, however, be disproportionate under article 26 of the Covenant.

It will be a global call to action.

Market logic, it is argued, dictates this result.

Avoiding that outcome presupposes a strong political center.

Three factors have brought this about.