To the author, this further confirms that the judge was partial and prejudiced.

This confirms that the author was indeed under house arrest.

The author claims that it would have been futile to lodge an amparo in his case.

Lastly, he asserts that the jurisprudence concerning applications for judicial review stemming from the case William R. v.

In further comments dated 12 February 2002, the author reiterates his earlier claims.

The author's comments

With regard to the State party's assertion that the communication should be directed against both States parties to the Agreement, the author maintains the opposite, bearing in mind that

The author is represented by counsel.

The author is represented by counsel.

He is represented by counsel.

Alleged victim Mr. Vladimir V. Zhurin (the author's son)

State party's submissions on the admissibility of the communication, and author's comments

The facts as submitted by the complainant

The facts as presented

Videotape submission by the author

The facts as submitted by the author

The facts as submitted

Committee's request for author's comments

Facts as submitted by the author

Author's request for interim measures

The author is not represented by counsel.

He is not represented by counsel.

The facts as presented

The author filed a counter claim.

Alleged victim The author

Alleged victim The author

Alleged victim The author

Alleged victim The authors

Dancel had them invited to the author's room.

Alleged victim The author

Alleged victim The author

Additional comments by the author

Alleged victim The author

The author of the communication is Mr.

In case of doubt as to the wish of the author, the Committee shall be seized of the communication.

The author thus asserts that he is the victim of a miscarriage of justice. He also emphasizes the delay in the decision of the Minister of Justice under section 690 of the Criminal Code.

State party's submission on admissibility and merits and author's comments thereon

Author's comments on the State party's observations on admissibility and merits

Pre admissibility submissions from the State party and the author's comments thereon

State party's response on admissibility and the merits and the author's comments thereon

Subsequent delays in the registration of his communication were due to circumstances outside the control of the author.

Author's comments on the State party's submission

The State party's observations and the author's comments

The author's comments on admissibility and the merits

The author's petition remains pending.