The communication was submitted by the author personally.

The author of the communication shall, through the Secretary General, be informed of the decision.

3.6 The authors submit that there are no available domestic remedies to be exhausted.

Where there is doubt as to the wish of the author or authors, the Secretary General will bring the communication to the attention of the Committee.

5.1 In comments on the State party's submissions of 2 December 2003, the authors contend that the communication is truly individual in nature.

3.1 The authors contend that they are victims of violations by the State party of articles 4 and 6 of the Convention.

3.3 The authors submit that they are victims notwithstanding the absence of any direct confrontation with the participants in the march.

3.5 The authors further state that, in any event, they have already been personally affected by the alleged violations.

Counsel further alleges that the complainant's wife also suffers from the same disorder and that she was subjected to torture in Bangladesh because of the complainant's political activities.

(e) Steps taken by the author and or victim to exhaust domestic remedies

In addition, he claims that prison officers were able to gain access to documents relating to his petitions.

3.1 The author claims to be a victim of a violation of article 14, paragraphs 1 and 3 (d), of the Covenant.

Schopp finally wrote the final two and a half chapters, based on the author's notes, to complete the story.

In addition to writing the book, an author has to acquire representation and negotiate this publishing chain.

2.5 The author appealed to the European Commission of Human Rights, alleging that the judges who tried him were not impartial.

The author filed criminal charges against the judges in the Supreme Court, alleging that they had committed an offence by handing down a manifestly unjust decision against him.

Name of Franklin.

5.2 As to the availability of domestic remedies in respect of the other areas (not covered by the earlier communication), the authors contend that the State party's suggestion of available remedies is misplaced.

3.1 The author claims that his initial detention was illegal and in violation of article 9, paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4.

In relation to the Ombudsman, he argues that although his her function is to conduct investigations of administrative action, the function is rarely used.

3.1 The author claims a violation of article 14 of the Covenant, as he was not afforded a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal.

3.1 The authors claim that the State party had violated their right to be treated with equality and their right to property by not complying with its contractual obligations.

In cases where the author can justify such action, communications may be submitted on behalf of an alleged victim without her consent.

The Secretariat shall be responsible for the distribution of the Committee's final decisions to the author or authors and the State party concerned.

He claims that he is a painter.

Olympus Mons.

The Secretary General may request clarification from the author or authors of a communication as to whether she, he or they wish to have the communication submitted to the Committee for consideration under the Optional Protocol.

3.1 The author alleges a violation of his right to equal protection of the law without discrimination and of his right to due process of law.

Although the author claims that he never lost Czech citizenship, he formally became Czech citizen again in May 1993.

3.1 The author alleges a violation of the right enshrined in article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant, owing to the fact that the Supreme Court did not appraise the evidence.

3.3 Secondly, the author contends that fundamental errors of law were made in the resolution of his claim by the Commission and the domestic courts, in violation of article 26.

3.1 The authors allege a violation of their right to due process under article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant for the following reasons

3.1 The author claims that the denial of an adequate remuneration for the work performed during his incarceration amounts to a violation of article 26 of the Covenant.

On 6 May 1997, his complaint was rejected as the HREOC lacked jurisdiction in the matter.

Where an author seeks to submit a communication in accordance with paragraph 2 of the present rule, she or he shall provide written reasons justifying such action.

It's called a water bear.

That's called kicking the horse.

A man named Turk?

If the Committee, working group or rapporteur so decides, the name or names and identifying details of the author or authors of a communication or the individuals who are alleged to be the victim or victims of a violation of rights set forth in the Convention shall not be made public by the Committee, the author or the State party concerned.

3.1 The author's basic allegation is that he has been subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment and torture in the Spanish prisons where he has been incarcerated under the special regime.

The author also claims that by hearing these motions in the absence of the author, the District Court violated article 379, paragraph 5, of the Civil Proceedings Code.

Given that the Compensation Act does not establish a requirement that each potential witness be contacted, the authors claim that they have been discriminated against in comparison to Jewish and other victims of racial persecution.

5.5 The author further claims that the residence restriction imposed upon him amounted to inhuman treatment prohibited by article 7 of the Covenant.

The Secretary General shall inform the author of a communication of the procedure that will be followed and in particular that, provided that the individual or individuals consent to the disclosure of her identity to the State party concerned, the communication will be brought confidentially to the attention of that State party.

Lieutenant Colonel.