The facts as presented

Alleged victim(s) The petitioner

The petitioner's comments on the State party's submissions

The petitioner contends that the following statements were made at the meeting from the podium b

It rejects the petitioner's argument that such an application would be ineffective as a result of the DPP refusal to prefer charges and the Ministry's finding the petitioner's appeal to be inadmissible.

6.2 On the issue of exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Committee notes that the petitioner confines his complaint to the handling of the complaint made against Mr. Andreasen, a case in which he did appeal to the Ministry of Justice.

It argues that the petitioner has failed to exhaust domestic remedies available in criminal proceedings in three respects.

Page limits have been replaced by word limits and the filing party must certify compliance with the word limit.

Admissible communications shall be considered by the Committee in the light of all information made available to it by the petitioner and the State party concerned.

6.3 Turning to the State party's argument that the petitioner should have initiated a private prosecution under the general provisions of section 267 of the Criminal Code, the Committee recalls that, in its Opinion in Sadic,i it indeed required the petitioner in that case to pursue such a course.

3.1 The petitioner alleges two counts of violation of articles 2, subparagraph 1 (d), 4 and 6 of the Convention.

The Committee thus need not address the argument that the petitioner did not also appeal the adverse decisions in certain other cases, though the Committee would note that there is nothing to suggest that the Ministry's decision of lack of standing would have been any different in those cases.

The opinion of the Committee shall be forwarded, through the Secretary General, to the petitioner and to the State party concerned, together with any suggestions and recommendations the Committee may wish to make.

The petitioner is Kamal Quereshi, a Danish national born 29 July 1970 and a current member of the State party's Parliament (Folketinget) for the Socialist Peoples Party (Socialistisk Folkeparti).

5.1 By letter of 2 August 2004, the petitioner disputes the State party's submissions on admissibility and reiterates his earlier submissions on the merits.

So far only one petition has been submitted to the Chancellor or Justice where the petitioner complained that the requirements for applying for Estonian citizenship were discriminating.

We hates it, we hates it, we hates it forever!

We French would give way to We Gauls, We Latins, We Bretons, We Franks, or We Europeans depending on the topic.

Any member of the Committee may request that a summary of his individual opinion be appended to the opinion of the Committee when it is forwarded to the petitioner and to the State party concerned.

We are a movemnt, we are pink warriors.

The petitioner relies on a decision of the High Court of Eastern Denmark of 1980 for the proposition that such statements do in fact fall within the scope of section 266 (b).

The Committee shall hold closed meetings when examining communications under the present Protocol. After examining a communication, the Committee shall forward its suggestions and recommendations, if any, to the State Party concerned and to the petitioner.

32 2003 (Sefic v.

The Committee may invite the presence of the petitioner or his representative and the presence of representatives of the State party concerned in order to provide additional information or to answer questions on the merits of the communication.

It also follows that the petitioner was not deprived of the right to an effective remedy for an act of racial discrimination in respect of Mr. Andreasen's statement.

We must talk about ourselves in our own words, on our own terms.

We in the West, we preach the values, the golden light of democracy, that we are the shining example of how it's done.

7.1 Acting under article 14, paragraph 7 (a), of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Committee has considered the information submitted by the petitioner and the State party.

A Oh no, we're just staging, ROD We're just staging it.

We're curious, and we just go out and get knowledge, you know?

We don't know where we are, the water is green, no white.

And ( further ) We have far more wealth and children ( than you ) , and we are not the ones to be punished .

We have incorporated death in your constitution , and We shall not be hindered

And they said , We are greater in wealth and children we will not be punished !

It is We Who have ordained death among you , and We have not been beaten

They also said , ' We are more abundant in wealth and children , and we shall not be chastised . '

We have decreed among you Death We shall not be outstripped

And they said we are more numerous in riches and children , and we are not going to be tormented .

We ! it is We Who have decreed death Unto you all . And We are not to be outrun .

And they say We are more in wealth and in children , and we are not going to be punished .

We have decreed death to you all , and We are not unable ,

And they say , We have more wealth and more children , and we will not be punished .

We have decreed death among you , and We will not be outstripped .

They always said We have more wealth and children than you have , and we shall not be chastised .

It is We Who ordained death upon you and We are not to be frustrated .