I am consulting you on that proposal.

That proposal is under consideration.

The Working Group agreed to that suggestion.

We would be supportive of that.

Even so, the proposal is a step in the right direction. German criticism should be directed at improving it, not at sandbagging it.

The Advisory Committee recommends acceptance of this proposal.

Even so, the proposal is a step in the right direction.

I really urge the Council to look at the other proposals as well, regarding both northern Uganda and the regional dimension of the crisis.

However, that suggestion did not elicit a consensus.

However, we should bear in mind that it is not the only proposal being considered by the international community.

There are three powerful arguments in favor of this proposal.

The suggestion met with no objections.

Several delegations objected to that proposal.

This proposal may puzzle some, but the logic is straightforward and irrefutable.

The United Kingdom and France rejected this suggestion, and continued to prepare for the conference.

The adoption of this proposal would make it possible to achieve substantial cost savings.

I shall try to elaborate on that proposal in several brief points.

Venizelos saw this as an opportunity to bring the country on the side of the Entente in the conflict.

Unfortunately, he did not favor this suggestion.

The Advisory Committee has no objection to this proposal.

The G 20 s emerging economies were not impressed.

This proposal was accepted by Tugu on 14 October 1999.

This proposal could come into effect much sooner.

This proposal came into effect on 1 April 2004.

This proposal seems to have found a certain degree of support from Berlusconi, though he would likely be the only one in the country to agree with it.

This suggestion was not taken up by the French government.

This proposal did not find support within the walls of the Parliament.

Statements in connection with the motion were made by the representatives of China and Cuba.

We suggest that this proposal be discussed at forthcoming meetings of the G20.

That proposal has no chance of success in Ukraine s parliament.

She commented on the proposal for a compensatory fund to cover adjustment costs in the context of preference erosion (referred to in background document TD B 52 4) and said that her Government would not be prepared to endorse such a proposal.

High income countries might find that reason enough to want out.

It also provides the women with greater bargaining power in their own households.

This approach provides an opportunity for the Commission as well as for Governments to consider the proposal and express their views.

I hope the Assembly will act promptly on this proposal.

Following consultations, it had agreed to have that proposal considered in the context of draft article 16 bis.

A large majority of the UN adopted the proposal on 15 November, despite attempts by some member states to obstruct, amend, or bury it.

It is unlikely that this would be possible even under central planning.

On a technical level this proposal was very different from the system that was finally realised.

In making this proposal it was our hope to continue the dialogue on combating destructive fishing practices.

The proposal was also communicated to the Depositary by the secretariat in a notification dated 26 May 2005.

We would welcome CD partners' views on this informal suggestion.

He hoped this meeting would serve as an important event to operationalize this far reaching proposal contained in the Roadmap.

The NAIC S proposal is now under discussion.

It is within this context that Lesotho supports the proposed establishment of a Peacebuilding Commission.