Numerous legal opinions for private persons, banks, States and the European Commission.

2000 Counsel in proceedings before the Swiss Federal Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice.

On February 7, 2006, Germany's Federal Constitutional Court ordered an early release of Motassadeq.

In February 1983 his decision was approved by the Federal Constitutional Court so that 1983 general elections could take place on March 6.

1966 Dr. iur. (magna cum laude).

Date and place of birth 25 June 1937, Berne.

1975 1999 Member of the European Commission of Human Rights.

Switzerland Committee of experts charged with preparing a comprehensive reform of the General Part of the Criminal Code.

Philips, International Law Reports, vol. 19, p. 557 (Federal Tribunal).

The judiciary comprises the Supreme Court and specialized courts such as the Constitutional Court, which deals with specific issues related to constitutional and business law.

The constitutional court will issue a decision by noon today.

E. Situation of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Electoral Court

1.2.2.3.1 Constitutional Court

3.3 The author did not make any application to the Constitutional Court for amparo.

The Klansmen were apprehended and prosecuted in court.

The Supreme Court allegedly totally ignored the Constitutional Court's decision in the author's case.

And now the Constitutional Court is being asked to strike it down.

The justices of the Constitutional Court have a mandatory retirement age of 70.

On 19 June 1989, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal.

Zurich Committee of experts for the reform of tax offences.

According to the State party, the author should have submitted an application for amparo to the Constitutional Court.

The judicial power is vested in the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court and the Economic Court.

Lastly, her application to the Constitutional Court for amparo was also rejected.

Subsequently, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court, alleging, among other arguments, the failure of the Provincial High Court to state the grounds for its decision.

Stefan Trechsel (Switzerland)

St. Gallen Committee of experts to elaborate guiding principles for the reform of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The authors filed an appeal before the Constitutional Court for amparo, claiming a violation of the principle of equality of arms.

Appointed member of the Union Public Service Commission, the apex federal Constitutional body in India for recruitment to civil services, on 3 September 1998 for a six year term

The amended constitution expands the constitutional court and the supreme council of judges and prosecutors.

Nobody knows how the Constitutional Court will rule on these objections.

SCAF has threatened to dissolve parliament by appealing against the Head of the Supreme Constitutional Court.

A further appeal to the Constitutional Court was rejected on 12 May 1998.

On 26 May 2000, the Federal Court of Canada denied the request.

The author then appealed (amparo) to the Constitutional Court (Tribunal Constitucional), which dismissed his appeal on 20 October 2004.

The decision of the Trial Division of the Federal Court may be appealed against before the Federal Court of Appeal. The latter decision may also be appealed against before the Supreme Court of Canada subject to the latter's granting of leave to appeal.

A decision taken under section 690 of the Criminal Code may thus be the subject of an application for judicial review to the Federal Court of Canada under article 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act.

Finally, the author instituted amparo proceedings in the Constitutional Court for the protection of her constitutional rights on the grounds of judicial error. This application was also denied.

The State party points out that the author should have lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.

2.8 On 26 May 1997 the Constitutional Court rejected the application.

The first author further alleges a violation of his right to adversarial proceedings before the Constitutional Court.

It notes that the Federal Court affirmed that the complainant had not demonstrated bias on the part of members of the panel.

In his submission on 23 April 2001, the author cited the Constitutional Court ruling of 28 June 1999 to allege that it was not necessary to lodge an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.

The Federal Court of Canada confirmed this decision on 26 May 2000.

The Federal Court of Appeal ruling may be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

PFUJ Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists.