The parties rightly feel a strong sense of propriety towards the Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

The Commission will proceed with the demarcation if and when the parties can reach agreement on its resumption.

(b) The competent authorities of both States Parties agree, subject to such conditions as those States Parties may deem appropriate.

(b) The competent authorities of both States Parties agree, subject to such conditions as those States Parties may deem appropriate.

The Parties call for the peaceful use of outer space and preventing the stationing of weapons and an arms race in outer space and, to that end, advocate the development of a corresponding international legal agreement.

While the Comprehensive Peace Agreement demonstrates a strong sense of national ownership, and, as reflected in the pages of the protocols and agreements, the parties will be responsible for its implementation, it also specifies numerous areas in which the parties request considerable assistance and support from the United Nations and the international community.

While there have been some efforts by the parties to disseminate the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, neither party has initiated a public campaign to explain the document to the public.

The parties have not yet fully established this aspect of the verification and monitoring mechanism laid out in the security arrangements set out in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

Nevertheless, the fact that both sides have agreed to continue the dialogue in a cordial atmosphere is seen as a step in the right direction in the realm of bilateral ties and cross border relations.

Sufficient funds were expected to be received to finance disarmament and demobilization activities to be carried out with the Government and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement Army (SPLM A), the two main parties to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

In addition, under the Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Republic of Guatemala concerning cooperation in maintaining security on the border between the two countries (13 June 2002) agreement was reached inter alia on the following

Public information staff are engaged in a programme to raise public awareness of the Mission's roles and functions requested by the parties in the Agreement, as well as its mandate under Security Council resolution 1590 (2005).

Supplementary submissions by the parties

Additional observations of the parties

This was a flagrant breach of article 4.15 of the Algiers Peace Agreement, which states The parties agree that the delimitation and demarcation determinations of the Commission shall be final and binding.

The tribunal was not required, in addition, to discuss all issues raised by the parties.

Each time that tensions had begun to lessen, however, the two parties would again spiral into violence.

There was support for the suggestion that the word claim should be deleted, and that the following phrase should be added after the word parties to the dispute under the contract of carriage after the dispute has arisen, in order to ensure that it was clear that any agreement on jurisdiction should not be reached until after both parties had notice of the dispute.

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, all information relating to the conciliation proceedings shall be kept confidential, except where disclosure is required under the law or for the purposes of implementation or enforcement of a settlement agreement.

This had not been contested by the parties.

The parties agreed to that proposal.

In the Framework Agreement on Security Arrangements during the Interim Period, dated 25 September 2003, the parties agreed to an internationally monitored ceasefire that was to come into effect once the Comprehensive Peace Agreement was signed.

Getting to

The two sides fought proxy wars in Africa and Asia.

The parties also agreed on further confidence building measures.

The parties act in accordance and comply with the Disengagement Agreement

The parties built a steel construction that was expected to prolong the life of the tree up to 15 years.

These two States parties have been invited to submit all their overdue reports as combined reports by June 2005.

Those events demonstrate that there can be common ground when both sides are willing to work constructively.

Fulfilment of this responsibility is a debt that the parties owe to their peoples.

The Government of and the Government of (hereinafter referred to as the Parties ),

The parties have given themselves six and a half years to implement their agreements.

The two parties undertake to negotiate without, however, disrupting the electoral process currently under way.

It should also be noted that the talks held by the parties on the topic of delimitation of marine and undersea areas in the Gulf of Venezuela which therefore covers the very important matter of sovereignty over the Los Monjes archipelago are, as agreed by the parties themselves, confidential.

The Parties call upon all the countries of the world to conduct a broad dialogue on the issue of the international order in the twenty first century.

They shall collaborate to observe and respect the ceasefire and resort to their own wisdom to contain and solve any problem that may arise.

It ended when the parties agreed on a truce in the Treaty of Novgorod (1557).

At the request of the Commission, the Contracting Parties shall

If the document is not available, both parties may feel insecure.

The Special Rapporteur and the Government exchanged views and agreed to continue to maintain a dialogue on the issue.

We have reached agreement on the Peacebuilding Commission.

The second lesson from Copenhagen is that to get a binding international agreement, there first must be a deal between the United States and China.

Dialogue with the US could focus on areas, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, where the two parties share a measure of common ground.

The transfer of three other major urban centres in the West Bank Nablus, Jenin and Hebron has been left by the parties for discussion at a later date.

Parties agreed to submit their disputes to arbitration and an agreed statement of facts and issues in dispute (which amounted to an arbitration agreement in the sense of article 7 (1) MAL) was filed with the arbitral tribunal.