A similar possibility exists in relation to the European Convention on Human Rights.

The State party recalls the Committee's decision on the complaint presented by the complainant's wife where the same guarantees were considered effective, and refers to relevant decisions of the European organs under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Austria also implements the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, since the European Convention on Human Rights is part of the Austrian constitution.

12.21 Before the European Court, the applicants claimed that Turkey had violated, inter alia, article 3 of the European Convention.

Boni had promised broad public consultations during the European ratification process.

The same was not true of the Kurds in Turkey. Greece was also a party to the European Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.

The European Patent Convention and EU Directive 98 44 EC

The provisions of EPC, however, do not define the meaning of varieties or essentially biological .

This provision is similar to article 53(a) of EPC.

All such practices are contrary to our usual practice and to the European Convention on Human Rights.

Finland had signed the European Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism on 16 May 2005.

For example, a number of Member States contested the ability of the EC to join the European Convention on Human Rights before the European Court of Justice.

The European Court of Human Rights had no jurisdiction to pronounce on acts of the European Community as the Community was not a party to the Convention.

Article 52(1) of EPC provides that European patents shall be granted for any inventions which are susceptible of industrial application, which are new and which involve an inventive step. The broad provision of article 52(1), however, is narrowed in scope in subsequent provisions of the EPC.

Another recent instrument in the same direction is the European Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.

The European Patent Convention and EU Directive 98 44 EC 29 41 10

However, the Court's judgement had focused on the obligations of High Contracting Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights that were also member States of the European Community.

Some constitutional provisions were compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, but not yet with the Covenant.

We believe that the European Convention must be implemented, as we are to become a member of the EU.

Moreover, the European Commission was duty bound to maintain the European Community's powers to adjust its rules to developments in areas covered by the draft convention.

This Protocol will enter into force when all the States Parties to the European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism (ETS No. 090) have ratified it.

That judgement makes it clear that there is a real possibility that a State party to the European Convention might find itself in a situation where, by implementing its obligations flowing from a United Nations sanctions regime, it is found in violation of rights protected by the Convention.

Bulgaria informed the Secretariat that it had ratified the main universal counter terrorism instruments, as well as the European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism and the Protocol amending that Convention.3

He pointed out that the European Court of Human Rights had ruled that non registration of an association on the basis of its memorandum of purpose and its name was allowed under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

He emphasizes, however, that in both cases the speed with which the removal was undertaken denied an effective exercise of a complaint mechanism, a circumstance that for the European Court disclosed a violation of article 34 of the European Convention.

As of February 2014, there are 77 state parties to the Convention plus the European Atomic Energy Community.

However, neither the European Convention nor its Protocols contain provisions equivalent to articles 10 and 26 of the Covenant.

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention read in conjunction with article 14 of the European Convention.

Otherwise, there can be circumstances in which the European Convention would have to prevail over other legal obligations.

Pentabromodiphenyl ether (proposed by Norway) Chlordecone (proposed by the European Community and its Member States that are Parties to the Convention) Hexabromobiphenyl (proposed by the European Community and its Member States that are Parties to the Convention) Lindane (proposed by Mexico) Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) (proposed by Sweden).

all acts caught under these conventions (the Tokyo Convention being a prime example) will be of a terrorist nature. It is notable in that regard that neither the European Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism nor the International Convention on the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism link themselves to the Tokyo Convention.

2.8 On 22 October 1996, the author applied to the European Commission of Human Rights, alleging, inter alia, a violation of article 6 of the European Convention.

The apparent difference could well be a sign of indirect discrimination in terms of the Convention and the rulings of the European Court of Justice.

American Convention on Human Rights, article 7 (1) European Convention on Human Rights, article 5 (1) African Charter on Human and People's Rights, article 6 (1) Arab Charter on Human Rights, article 5.

m Reference is made to article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The latter reflects Denmark's obligations under article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and hence article 7 of the Covenant.

The main multilateral treaty referred to was the 1972 European Convention on the Transfer of Proceedings in Criminal Matters.

The European Convention on Human Rights has been incorporated into the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and therefore enjoys supremacy over any local laws or regulations.

The European Court examined the matter, when declaring the application inadmissible under article 35, paragraph 4, of the European Convention, on the ground that the author's complaints do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols .

It submits that the European Court of Human Rights reached the same conclusion on 29 May 2002, when it found the same case inadmissible, for being outside the scope of article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

He discussed how the right was dealt with by the European Convention on Human Rights in its article 13 and by the European Court of Human Rights, which had recognized a right of redress following an arbitrary arrest, on the basis of article 5.

As at 30 June 2005, 147 States and the European Community were parties to the Convention and therefore members of the Authority.1

See e.g. Convention on Cybercrime, adopted on 23 November 2001, European Treaty Series, No. 185.

The European Convention on Extradition and its Additional Protocol in 1998 and the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and its Protocol No. 1 and Protocol No. 2 in 1996

The Committee observes that articles 8 and 17 of the Covenant largely converge with articles 4 and 8 of the European Convention.