Land for Peace in Kosovo

It was clear that peace in the region was dependent on the implementation of the relevant resolutions of the Security Council and respect for the principle of land for peace.

In 1991, they convened on a platform of land for peace.

The principle of land for peace is equally valid in addressing the other tracks of the Middle East conflict.

A negotiated land for peace solution still remains official Western doctrine.

Moreover, land for peace never made sense from an economic point of view.

3. Stresses the necessity for commitment to the principle of land for peace and the implementation of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973), which form the basis of the Middle East peace process

Iraq s Jobs for Peace Mirage

With respect to the Syrian Golan Heights, Nigeria calls on the parties to adopt flexibility and to resume peace negotiations under the principle of land for peace, which, in our view, will guarantee much needed peace and security in the region.

The Arab peace initiative, which was adopted at the Beirut Arab Summit of 2002, reiterated that peace is the strategic option of the Arab countries, to be achieved within the framework of the strict implementation of the principle of land for peace and in accordance with international law.

That contravenes the relevant United Nations resolutions and the principle of land for peace, and it is bound to exacerbate Israeli Palestinian discord.

It's called Peace on Earth.

The relevant Security Council resolutions, the principle of land for peace and bilateral understandings constitute the pillars of a negotiated, just, comprehensive and sustainable settlement of the conflict in the Middle East.

He emphasized that the Middle East peace talks should be based on the relevant UN resolutions, and should observe the land for peace principle adopted at the Madrid Peace Conference.

That will pave the way to a comprehensive, just and peaceful settlement in our region, as foreseen in the 1991 Madrid peace summit and the implementation of the land for peace principle.

A just and comprehensive peace was a strategic option for which to strive through the implementation of the relevant United Nations resolutions and the fulfilment of all agreements and commitments, the Madrid terms of reference, the principle of peace for land, the Arab peace initiative and the road map.

Over against Israel's defiance and rejection of a just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East, Syria has for many long years made every possible effort towards a successful outcome of the peace process in the Middle East based on the terms of reference of the Madrid Peace Conference, Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) and principle of land for peace.

It must be based on the terms of reference of the Madrid Conference, in particular the principle of land for peace, as well as on the implementation of the road map and all existing agreements between the parties.

Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), land for peace and the principles of the Madrid Conference represented the best means to effect an end to the conflict and the restoration of the rights of the Palestinian people.

The international community should take action to bring about a comprehensive, peaceful settlement of the Arab Israeli conflict, in accordance with the resolutions of international legitimacy, the road map, the principle of land for peace and the Madrid terms of reference.

The Syrian leadership has reiterated its desire for a resumption of the peace process in order to achieve such a peace, in implementation of the United Nations resolutions in question and on the basis of the outcome of the Madrid Peace Conference, the principle of land for peace and the Arab principles adopted at the Beirut Summit in March 2002.

The small distances on the ground make for big problems in peace negotiations.

Syria has repeatedly stated that the requirements for achieving peace have become known and have met with the agreement of the international community, i.e., Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, the terms of reference of the Madrid Peace Conference, the Arab peace initiative adopted at the Beirut Summit in 2002 and the principal of land for peace.

Also demands Israel to fully respect all the foundations of the peace process as initiated in Madrid, consistent with Security Council resolutions 242 and 338 and the land for peace formula, and to abide by all the commitments and pledges reached so far.

The Middle East peace process must be accelerated on the basis of the relevant Security Council resolutions and the principle of land for peace, and the agreements between the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Government of Israel must be honoured.

4. Stresses the necessity for a commitment to the vision of the two State solution and the principle of land for peace, as well as the implementation of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973) and 1397 (2002)

Moreover, from a diplomatic standpoint, the territories were regarded as bargaining chips ( land for peace ) to be used in achieving a negotiated solution.

The parties concerned should seize the favorable opportunities to pursue a final proper solution to the Middle East questions on the basis of relevant resolutions of the United Nations (UN) and the principle of land for peace .

In this regard, we look forward to strengthening our peace efforts in order to reinvigorate the road map, as well as peace negotiations in the region, in fulfilment of the commitments included in resolutions of international legitimacy and in accordance with the principle of land for peace based on 1967 borders, in order to bring stability, prosperity, cooperation and development to the people of the entire region.

But from whom do you buy the land?

Raul Midon plays Peace on Earth

And here, it's all peace on Earth, good will to men.

Nor heaven nor earth have been at peace tonight.

5. Stresses the necessity for a commitment to the vision of the two State solution and the principle of land for peace, and the implementation of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002) and 1515 (2003)

We believe that the solution to the Palestinian issue lies in conducting political talks in accordance with relevant United Nations resolutions and the principle of land for peace, and in building an independent Palestinian State based on the road map.

It would inevitably remain in that role until the problem of those refugees and the question of Palestine were settled in accordance with the relevant United Nations resolutions and, in the case of latter, with the principle of land for peace.

Expressing concern over Israel's destruction of the Peace Process which was launched by the Madrid Conference on the basis of the Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, as well as the land for peace formula and the risks resulting from Israel's reneging on the commitments and obligations reached,

But clearing the ground for peace is not always peaceful.

We support the Palestinian people in their struggle for self determination and for the establishment of an independent and sovereign State on their national soil on the basis of the relevant General Assembly and Security Council resolutions, the principle of land for peace, the road map, the Arab Peace Initiative and the Sharm el Sheikh understandings.

A negotiated land for peace solution still remains official Western doctrine. As US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put it in a recent speech, a just, lasting, and comprehensive peace has to be based on two states for two peoples.

That initiative offered peace, recognition of Israel and establishing normal relations with Israel in return for withdrawal and the return of the refugees.

As Netanyahu s statements suggested, the Israelis have some serious concerns if the basic equation remains after all land for peace, just who will their interlocutors be after the dust has settled in the Arab world?

We demand that Israel implement its legal obligations in accordance with Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 425 (1978) 1397 (2002) and 1515 (2003), the principle of land for peace and the road map.

The occupation itself was in fact a flagrant human rights violation and Israeli practices flouted the international community's efforts to achieve a just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East, in violation of numerous Security Council resolutions and the principle of exchange of land for peace.

Some think it represents the figure of peace, some the figure or Tellus, or Mother Earth.