However, the European Union reserved the right to revert to the issue at a later date.

He would continue to raise the issue until he received satisfactory answers to those questions.

A member may not, in raising a point of order, speak on the substance of the matter under discussion.

A member raising a point of order may not speak on the substance of the matter under discussion.

This year it's going to be even more spectacular than last year.

The question is this.

In order to do so, it might need either to integrate the right to an effective remedy into each primary right or else to raise the issue proprio motu.

We urge the UN Security Council to raise the issue.

Tell me how to solve the problem.

Most troubling is the absence of open debate about these matters.

So far as this matter is concerned, I am completely satisfied.

Therein lies a profound contradiction.

Why did you start blogging about this?

Any student can solve this problem.

We will report further on this issue.

Accordingly, we trust that the Council will remain seized of this matter and continue with the practice of having open debates on this important issue.

It is no use trying to solve this problem.

Let's discuss that problem later.

5. Decides to remain seized of the matter.

Or perhaps that is precisely the point.

The issue should be deferred again.

However, this issue is defined differently.

That question should perhaps be made clear in the commentary.

Decides to remain seized of this matter.

In my view, this is the most fundamental point.

The United Nations has brought this issue to centre stage.

They requested the Secretariat to address this issue.

Reliable data on this issue is not available.

The United Nations is not alone on this issue.

UNAMA is facilitating discussions in this matter.

The actions of this group re provoked the debate on the disclosure of security flaws.

This article was initially viewed as the most contentious in the Convention.

This was a very important issue for his Group, and it would be important for the Board to return to the matter at its thirty seventh executive session.

I would like to take this opportunity to explain China's position on this question.

She doesn't want me to speak about this matter.

She doesn't want me to speak about this issue.

The problem is actually an extrapolation from the game show.

The consensus on this question does honour to the Organization.

My Government considers that a high priority.

Debate on the issue therefore resumed in plenary.

Decides to remain seized of the matter.

Recalling its previous resolutions on this issue,

Decides to remain actively seized of this matter.

Decides to remain seized of the matter.

This matter, however, is not for the Committee to determine.