Furthermore, it notes the State party's statement that the complaint should be declared inadmissible for lack of substantiation.

The complaint

Date of complaint 6 May 1999

Date of complaint 8 February 2002

Date of complaint 19 November 2002

Date of complaint 28 November 2002

Date of complaint 25 June 2003

Date of complaint 28 February 2000

(c) The object of the complaint

Encourage complaint submission.

However, this is contradicted by the statement in the Government's observations, not contested by the source, that Ms. Bakhmina's lawyer lodged a complaint with the authorities of unlawful actions by the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Date of the complaint 20 December 2001

Date of the complaint 8 November 2002

Date of the complaint 12 December 2002

Date of the complaint 16 January 2003

Having concluded its consideration of complaint No.

Date of the complaint 7 June 2002

Date of the complaint 16 September 2002

Date of complaint 29 November 2001 (initial submission)

Will anyone lodge a complaint?

2.3 Fearing possible reprisals by police and not fully aware of his legal rights, the complainant did not file a criminal complaint with the Novi Sad Municipal Public Prosecutor's Office until 7 November 1996. In the complaint he alleged that an unidentified police officer had committed the crime of extracting a statement by force in violation of 65 of the Serbian Criminal Code (SCC).

7.1 The Committee considered the admissibility of the complaint at its thirtieth session and declared the complaint admissible in a decision of 29 April 2003.

Most of the 80 test subjects complied without complaint.

Date of the complaint 29 August 2000 (initial submission)

Procedural issues Exhaustion of domestic remedies substantiation of the complaint

He filed a formal complaint of abduction with us, do you understand? After receiving a formal complaint we are responsible for conducting an investigation.

The State party's observations on the admissibility of the complaint

Two treaties have no complaint procedures, and far fewer States have acceded to existing complaint procedures than to the treaties themselves.

The authors allege that the Supreme Court of Justice has done nothing  on their complaint from 1997 to the time of the submission of their complaint to the Committee.

The complaint should therefore be found inadmissible.

(a) That the complaint is inadmissible and

(a) That the complaint is inadmissible and

Procedural issues Failure to substantiate the complaint

(2) Having addressed the merits of the complaint, the Committee must address the failure of the State party to cooperate fully with the Committee in the resolution of the complaint.

The same day, DRC filed a complaint with the Varde police, alleging that the statement made by Mr. Rindal violated section 266 (b) (1) and (2) on the basis that it threatened a group of people on account of their race and ethnic origin.

However, the Presidium of the Supreme Court considered the author's supervisory complaint' (the complaint forwarded by the Public Defender) and commuted the sentence which had been imposed.

State party's observations on the admissibility and merits of the complaint

State party's submissions on the admissibility and merits of the complaint

Supplementary submissions by the parties on the merits of the complaint

The complaint had been lodged by the United States of America.

Optional non participation of a member in the examination of a complaint

A model complaint form has been widely distributed via the focal point network and local NGOs a hotline has been established for confidential reporting, supplemented by an e mail complaint system and a mailing address for complaint forms.

13.10 Having addressed the merits of the complaint, the Committee must address the failure of the State party to cooperate fully with the Committee in the resolution of the current complaint.

Statement of purpose

Statement of purpose