International cooperation, exemplified by the mutual learning implicit in the E 9 exercise, is also being tapped.

The evaluation is a forward looking, lesson learning exercise as well as an assessment of results.

This methodology was used for those new countries to MONEYVAL which underwent a first mutual evaluation in 2003.

The evaluation exercise was overseen by the Evaluation Office with the close involvement of the headquarters of the Regional Bureau for Arab States and was conducted applying a mix of direct and meta evaluation techniques utilizing the findings of in depth outcome evaluations of individual programmes conducted in advance of the exercise.

Such as becoming members of FATF or FATF style regional bodies, pursuing self or mutual evaluation or implementing FATF recommendations.

The self evaluation exercise looked at strengths and weaknesses and pointed to areas where the Office could be improved.

The evaluation recommends a special corporate gender budget exercise to determine what financial resources UNDP needs for gender mainstreaming.

MONEYVAL completed on site mutual evaluation visits in 2003. which included terrorist financing issues in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Serbia and Montenegro, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The evaluation exercise that was held recently at the Institute lead to the recommendation that the course also be provided in other countries.

Many States have engaged in a series of self evaluation exercises, and mutual evaluations , undertaken through regional bodies for countering money laundering that are similar to FATF.

This team performed the second mutual evaluation of the Brazilian anti money laundering and financing of terrorism system, which took place in the end of 2003 and early 2004.

Since the year 2003 the MONEYVAL has used for mutual evaluation a new comprehensive Anti Money Laundering and Combating Terrorist Financing (AML CFT) Methodology, which incorporates the financing of terrorism issue.

The international community should strengthen cooperation and establish development partnerships based on mutual trust, mutual benefit and mutual help.

But such a world requires that mutual respect replace mutual suspicion.

Reconciliation is possible only when there is mutual striving and mutual good will.

Evaluation

Evaluation

Evaluation

Mutual legal assistance

mutual legal assistance.

mutual legal assistance

Potential mutual reinforcement

It should foster a new security concept featuring mutual trust, mutual benefit, equality and coordination, enhance mutual trust through dialogue and promote common security through cooperation.

Strengthening evaluation

(c) Evaluation.

(c) Evaluation

C. Evaluation

Evaluation cCriteria

Independent evaluation

The attraction was mutual.

In that event, there remains the hope that mutual nuclear deterrence will promote mutual common sense.

Requests for mutual legal assistance

E. Management evaluation

UNHCR'S EVALUATION POLICY

Monitoring and evaluation

In depth evaluation

Programme questions evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation

(i) Thematic evaluation

E. Evaluation activities

Item 11 Evaluation

Effectiveness evaluation report

Monitoring and Evaluation

Item 3 Evaluation

Independent Evaluation Unit