Similarly, during the hearing on 6 July 1999, the Circuit Court refused to allow the author to testify or to otherwise participate in the hearing.

She claims that no translator was present during the District Court hearing of 22 July 1999 and that the contradictions the court found in her story are attributable to problems of interpretation.

The Court will begin hearing the case on July 5.

As a consequence, the court postponed the hearing until 23 February 1996 and ordered the author's compulsory appearance at the hearing.

The Court did not acknowledge receipt of the motion to delay the hearing.

During this hearing, he referred to the judge as his fiancée .

The court has not yet announced the date and time of the appeal hearing.

For example, the Court held an online public hearing on victims and defence issues in the preparation of the Regulations of the Court.6 This hearing allowed wide participation in the process of adopting the Regulations and the Court received responses from all over the world.

Privileges and immunities during court proceedings

According to the author, the Supreme Court followed its usual practice of not hearing the testimony of any witnesses during the review process, relying solely upon the lower courts' appreciation of the evidence.

The two judges of the Supreme Court availed themselves of this option and author's counsel stated expressly during the oral questioning at the public hearing of 4 October 1999 that he did not object.

Everyone has the right to seek a hearing of his case by a competent, impartial court.

On October 10, the villagers lawyers were told that the court hearing scheduled that day was canceled.

During the hearing of this motion on 6 February 2003, the author was summarily convicted of contempt of court and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment (meaning that he would be compelled to perform hard labour).

On 15 March 1996, the Plock District Court held a closed hearing on the motion to change liquidators.

A court hearing has been set on June 1 to hear the claims of the representative of the government.

In the State party's view, it cannot be held responsible for the author's inability to attend each court hearing.

The hearing was not held in open Court but in the judge's chambers and according to the author neither he nor his lawyer were notified of the time and place of the hearing.

The briefing was completed during the reporting period and the case is being prepared for a hearing.

The European Court of Human Rights is hearing oral arguments in two of the most important cases in its history.

According to the author, this request was delivered to the Court by 8.00 a.m. on the day of the hearing.

However, the actual extradition will take longer if the suspect contests it, as at least one court hearing would be required.

The Commission took 71 cases to court during the same period.

During the same period, the Commission took 30 cases to court.

During the pleadings before the Court, Australia's counsel stated as follows

The federal court ruled that under the Geneva Conventions, Hamdan, as a prisoner of war, was entitled to a court hearing that followed the same procedures as one judging soldiers of the detaining power, that is, an American court martial.

2.2 On 10 February 1997, at the beginning of the court hearing, the author asked the trial judge to refer the case to another court, claiming that The Hague Regional Court could not be considered an independent and impartial tribunal.

To Him belongs all that rests during the night and the day . He is All hearing and All knowing .

To Him belongs all that rests during the night and the day . He is All hearing and All knowing .

During the hearing on 23 November 1990, the CBC agreed to reconsider the matter and the appeal was abandoned.

For these reasons, on 26 January 1996, the court held a hearing at which the author, albeit duly summoned, did not appear.

2.3 On 1 June 1998, the author went to the court registry to examine her case file and requested copies of the transcript of the court hearing and decision of 5 February 1998.

3.1 The author claims that his hearing before the Court of Appeal was contrary to article 14 as two of the judges who rendered judgement in this appeal, also sit on the Utrecht Regional Court.

2.3 The author appealed to the Hague Court of Appeal and, at the beginning of the hearing, sought referral of the case to another Court of Appeal, for the same reason as in 2.2 above.

But reason does not seem to be getting much of a hearing during the current health care debate in the US.

3.4 In his letter dated 5 May 1999, the complainant submits that the Federal Court did not apply the criteria appropriate to a fair hearing.

During the hearing Greste told the judge The idea that I could have an association with the Muslim Brotherhood is frankly preposterous.

During this hearing, counsel for the United States Government presented a memorandum from the FBI characterizing Mr. Ali as a suspected terrorist.

And you're not hearing the same thing that most people who have normal hearing are hearing.

In 2008, Peru took the case to the International Court of Justice(ICJ) which, in turn, considered the issue at a public hearing in December 2012.

As a result of confusion in his schedule, her counsel did not appear at the hearing, despite which the court examined the substance of the case.

You wouldn't want decent hearing, you would want perfect hearing.

The Pest Central District Court has held hearings on 5 November 2003, 9 January and 13 February 2004. The next hearing is scheduled for 21 April 2004.

He submits that his failure to be present at the hearing on 26 January 1996, was due to his son's illness, of which he informed the Court.

The issues at this evidentiary hearing were limited and the appellate Circuit Court asked the trial judge to rule again on the motion of a new trial