On 26 September 2016, the Court of First Instance in Muscat held its final hearing in the trial of Al Maamari, Al Haj, and Al Abri, and issued prison sentences against them. The court also ordered the newspaper to close permanently.

The Court will begin hearing the case on July 5.

As a consequence, the court postponed the hearing until 23 February 1996 and ordered the author's compulsory appearance at the hearing.

The Court did not acknowledge receipt of the motion to delay the hearing.

The court has not yet announced the date and time of the appeal hearing.

Similarly, during the hearing on 6 July 1999, the Circuit Court refused to allow the author to testify or to otherwise participate in the hearing.

For example, the Court held an online public hearing on victims and defence issues in the preparation of the Regulations of the Court.6 This hearing allowed wide participation in the process of adopting the Regulations and the Court received responses from all over the world.

Everyone has the right to seek a hearing of his case by a competent, impartial court.

On October 10, the villagers lawyers were told that the court hearing scheduled that day was canceled.

On 15 March 1996, the Plock District Court held a closed hearing on the motion to change liquidators.

The decision of the Supreme Court is final and there is no possibility of appeal.

The legal system comprises a Court of Appeal, a Supreme Court and a Magistrate's Court, with a final appeal procedure lying open to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom.

A court hearing has been set on June 1 to hear the claims of the representative of the government.

In the State party's view, it cannot be held responsible for the author's inability to attend each court hearing.

The final eviction took place peacefully after police received a court order to vacate the building.

Nadal won the first four, beginning with the Dubai final in February played on hard court.

On 4 September 2003, the Budapest Regional Court (Főrvărosi Bíróság) issued a final decision authorizing L.

The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), (based in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago), is the court of last resort (final jurisdiction) over Barbadian law.

There is no possibility of a re evaluation of evidence by the Supreme Court, as all factual determinations by the lower court are considered final.

The hearing was not held in open Court but in the judge's chambers and according to the author neither he nor his lawyer were notified of the time and place of the hearing.

The European Court of Human Rights is hearing oral arguments in two of the most important cases in its history.

According to the author, this request was delivered to the Court by 8.00 a.m. on the day of the hearing.

However, the actual extradition will take longer if the suspect contests it, as at least one court hearing would be required.

If Khodorkovsky disagrees with the final decision of the Russian courts, he will undoubtedly appeal to that court.

The Court issued its judgement on 17 December 2002, and both parties accepted it as final and binding.

She claims that no translator was present during the District Court hearing of 22 July 1999 and that the contradictions the court found in her story are attributable to problems of interpretation.

The federal court ruled that under the Geneva Conventions, Hamdan, as a prisoner of war, was entitled to a court hearing that followed the same procedures as one judging soldiers of the detaining power, that is, an American court martial.

2.2 On 10 February 1997, at the beginning of the court hearing, the author asked the trial judge to refer the case to another court, claiming that The Hague Regional Court could not be considered an independent and impartial tribunal.

For these reasons, on 26 January 1996, the court held a hearing at which the author, albeit duly summoned, did not appear.

2.3 On 1 June 1998, the author went to the court registry to examine her case file and requested copies of the transcript of the court hearing and decision of 5 February 1998.

Moreover, our Court of Final Appeal calls on some of the most esteemed minds of the common law world.

The Appeal Court struck it down as contrary to public policy in its final judgement of 7 April 1992.

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court and final arbiter and has been led since 2000 by the Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin (the first female Chief Justice).

The Member in question shall have the right of recourse in the final instance to the International Court of Justice.

The Member in question shall have the right of recourse in the final instance to the International Court of Justice.

3.1 The author claims that his hearing before the Court of Appeal was contrary to article 14 as two of the judges who rendered judgement in this appeal, also sit on the Utrecht Regional Court.

2.3 The author appealed to the Hague Court of Appeal and, at the beginning of the hearing, sought referral of the case to another Court of Appeal, for the same reason as in 2.2 above.

The Law Reform Commission had been restructured and had produced a final report on the establishment of a proposed family court.

In December 2004, a panel of the Supreme Court decided to postpone the final judgement on the petition against the law.

3.4 In his letter dated 5 May 1999, the complainant submits that the Federal Court did not apply the criteria appropriate to a fair hearing.

And you're not hearing the same thing that most people who have normal hearing are hearing.

In 2008, Peru took the case to the International Court of Justice(ICJ) which, in turn, considered the issue at a public hearing in December 2012.

As a result of confusion in his schedule, her counsel did not appear at the hearing, despite which the court examined the substance of the case.

You wouldn't want decent hearing, you would want perfect hearing.

Moreover, those rulings post date the final judgement in the present case handed down by the Court of Cassation on 14 March 2000.