Others have quickly embraced and promoted Jibril s allegation.

Thirdly, independent evidence tends to corroborate the allegation of torture.

To support this allegation the source makes the following points

However the allegation that polonium was used was a new detail.

See articles 12 14 in relation to an allegation of torture.

After all, motive and context are legitimate questions in any serious criminal allegation.

The Armenian allegation about a blockade had no legal basis and was untrue.

The Working Group notes that the Government did not comment on this allegation.

As such, the allegation of torture is inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies.

A general allegation for application of the agreement in respect of certain employees is not enough.

His clear implication is that fraud was committed at Barclays a serious allegation from Britain s finance minister.

The government reiterates its firm condemnation of torture and recognises its responsibility to investigate any reasonable allegation.

It was kind of along these lines, and the allegation was that I have, quote, affection for terrorists.

This allegation is based on the fact that foreign inspectors have carried out inspections of the Alpha Serengeti.

During the period under review, one allegation was received but was found to be unsubstantiated following an investigation.

4.3 The State party rejects the allegation that the author was unable to cross examine witnesses in court.

One allegation, made recently by a well known French publicist, is that the arrest was typical of American puritanism.

The Committee takes note of the complainant's allegation that his treatment constituted torture within the meaning of the Convention.

The State party has neither contested this allegation nor given any justification for arresting the author without a warrant.

This allegation of the source is corroborated by the Working Group's own findings reached during its visit in Belarus.

The State party thus argues that the allegation of ill treatment on that date has been effectively refuted by its Ambassador's observations.

Once a person has established an allegation of discrimination the burden of proof shifts to the person who is suspected of discriminatory activities.

Finally, the State party argues that the brief communication lacks sufficient material basis, including basic evidence, that would go beyond a mere allegation.

In particular, there is no allegation that Mr. Celal, who the evidence showed was almost certainly driving the pickup away, posed any risk.

The Commission considered that the allegation related to the lack of impartiality was not raised in the appeal (cassation) to the Supreme Court.

The author's allegation that no judicial body ever responded substantively to his defence relating to the tapped telephone calls with his lawyer was unfounded.

Similarly, there has been no denial of the allegation that evidence found in the home of the accused had been planted there hours earlier.

The allegation by Amnesty International that some Saharan human rights defenders had been arrested and tortured in Moroccan jails was a matter of grave concern.

In the Committee's view, those reports lend considerable weight to his allegation that he was tortured during the interrogations he underwent in a military camp.

In addition, the Swedish authorities apparently did not seek to call any medical expertise, particularly after the complainant's direct allegation of torture in March 2003.

They are 10 Saudi academicians who were arrested earlier this year and accused of financing terrorism an allegation that is yet to be proved against them.

It is often the case that mandate holders can report an allegation and the Government's explanation but cannot reach a conclusion because the facts are disputed.

It shifts the burden of proof to the party accused of discrimination, thus strengthening the position, in civil law proceedings, of the person making the allegation.

It concludes that this part of the communication should be found inadmissible, under article 2 of the Optional Protocol, since the allegation was not sufficiently substantiated.

When the prosecutor requests the police gendarmes to investigate an allegation, they may not do so with the same efficiency as they would investigate attacks against themselves.

In the absence of further information, the Committee considers that this allegation is not sufficiently substantiated and accordingly declares it inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

In addition, this allegation was not made in the domestic courts, so that it should be considered inadmissible under article 5, paragraph 2 (b), of the Optional Protocol.

The process, in general, involved the sending of a letter to the concerned Government requesting information and comments on the allegation and that preventive or investigatory action be taken.

In February, Syria s state news agency accused jihadi rebels of firing a rocket containing chemical materials in Khan al Assal an allegation that the British television outlet Channel Four backs.

In the present case, the allegation that Mr. Durdykuliyev was not allowed to appeal to a judge or independent organ against his internment in a psychiatric facility was not challenged.

3.1 The author's basic allegation is that he has been subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment and torture in the Spanish prisons where he has been incarcerated under the special regime.

In order to establish his allegation, the appellant should have proved that his case was the same as that of the cases in respect of which the relevant agreement was applied.

The clarification offered by the Government, however, does not offer any supporting documentation or other evidence to support the allegation that Mr. Zhao's detention is in fact unrelated to his activities.

In this regard the evidence submitted by the complainant is insufficient, in that the primary focus is an allegation that she was tortured 17 months after being expelled from the State party.

It also states that disagreement with a court decision does not signify that it was handed down by an arbitrary judge lacking in sensitivity, unless the allegation is duly substantiated and justified.