America needs a big stimulus package.

Now we're running a stimulus package.

It's called the trillion dollar stimulus package.

A second fiscal stimulus package is therefore likely.

First, we need a global stimulus package to turn this crisis around.

The real danger of the new stimulus package is not ideological but environmental.

It follows that an additional stimulus package in 2010 would be another mistake...

China s 4 trillion stimulus package, unveiled in November 2008, restored confidence in global commodity markets.

And then we do the OPEC stimulus package also known as 200 dollars a barrel.

Unlocking that cash would give Europe a much larger stimulus package than any government can provide.

So I really cannot understand Barro s last paragraph The fiscal stimulus package of 2009 was a mistake.

Now it has responded, with a stimulus package that is too little, too late, and badly designed.

Indeed, even after the new stimulus package, China will still depend on investment and export for growth.

So I really cannot understand Barro s last paragraph The fiscal stimulus package of 2009 was a mistake.

But, having said all that, the stimulus package gave the economy a necessary shot in the arm.

Since then, we got about 50 million dollars in stimulus package money to come and get here.

In response to the global financial crisis in 2008, China introduced a RMB4 trillion ( 634 billion) stimulus package.

Government investment, which represents the major part of China s anti crisis stimulus package, should help in this regard.

And some of the government spending in the stimulus package will replace other outlays that would have occurred anyway.

Similarly, the tax changes in such a stimulus package should provide incentives to increase spending by households and businesses.

All these factors are not only part of China s economic rescue package, but of Obama s stimulus plan as well.

We hope that the new stimulus package helps to move China toward greener development, and that countries follow suit.

A massive stimulus package, prompted by the 1970 s rise in oil prices, gave rise to an entirely new industry.

Each country will try to design its stimulus package to maximize the impact on its own citizens not the global impact.

The stimulus package appears big more than 2 of GDP per year but one third of it goes to tax cuts.

The government, well aware of the overcapacity problem, focused the country s stimulus package on investment in infrastructure, rather than new factories.

The government s stimulus package demonstrates that it is aware of the risks in the global economy and is prepared to act decisively.

The infrastructure component has not yet been spent because of long lags in turning the US stimulus package into real construction projects.

In the United States, those who argue for another stimulus package observe that it was always wishful thinking to believe that a 787 billion package could offset a 3 trillion fall in private spending.

To offset the negative shock, the Chinese government enacted a four trillion renminbi stimulus package, and the PBC shifted its policy stance abruptly.

The real failings in the Obama recovery program, however, lie not in the stimulus package but in its efforts to revive financial markets.

The new summit is unlikely to produce either a coordinated stimulus package or a detailed blueprint for a foolproof system of financial regulation.

China s stimulus package was by far the world s largest and most effectively implemented. It stabilized growth in China and moderated the global economic contraction.

Indeed, all Western governments, with the exception of the Obama administration, are committed to retrenchment and Obama cannot get a new stimulus package through Congress.

An optimistic estimate of the direct increase in annual demand from the stimulus package is about 300 billion in each of the next two years.

Many European countries cannot afford a stimulus package, owing to overstretched public finances, and instead want to make progress on the international regulation of banking.

Last month, China announced a 586 billion economic stimulus package, some 25 of which is to help bolster conservation, environmental protection, and renewable energy efforts.

Unemployment remains persistently high, despite the 787 billion stimulus package in 2009, and house prices, though recovering slowly, remain far below their pre 2008 peak.

As a result, in the last four years, China s M2, spurred by a stimulus package totaling 4 trillion in 2008 and 2009, has more than doubled.

The perception of pent up demand was like a powerful economic stimulus package, and it had the advantage that people believed it would be long lasting.

The US Congress lacks the stomach for another stimulus package. It has already faced intense criticism for its failure to get the country s fiscal house in order.

The Obama administration then assumed responsibility for organizing the government s efforts to boost recovery, the centerpiece being a large stimulus package to shore up the real economy.

As N. Gregory Mankiw said of a stimulus package back in 2003, when he was President George W. Bush's chief economic advisor, this is not rocket science.

This partly explains not only why democracies such as India and Brazil lag behind China in infrastructure, but also why China is focusing its new stimulus package on transport systems (railroad projects alone will receive more than half of the 586 billion stimulus).

Following the capital injections and Fed programs aimed at supporting the financial system, the stimulus package was an important step, notwithstanding disagreements about its size, effectiveness, and targeting.