Amendment to proposal by the Mexican Delegation

When an amendment to a proposal is moved, the amendment shall be voted on first.

When an amendment to a proposal is moved, the amendment shall be voted upon first.

A proposal is considered an amendment to another proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

When an amendment is moved to a proposal, the amendment shall be voted on first. When two or more amendments are moved to a proposal, the Conference shall vote first on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom, and so on, until all the amendments have been put to the vote.

A motion is considered an amendment to a proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

A motion is considered an amendment to a proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

A motion is considered an amendment to a proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of the proposal.

A motion is considered an amendment to a proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

A motion is considered an amendment to a proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

If the proposal to make an amendment is rejected that proposal loses its legal meaning and effect, and along with it, that Parties' notifications that formed the basis for the proposal lose their legal meaning and effect as well.

Proposed amendment of the Montreal Protocol At its twenty fifth meeting, the Open ended Working Group considered the proposal from the European Community for an amendment to the Protocol calling for an expedited procedure for listing new ozone depleting substances in the Protocol.

Amendment to Proposal by the Government of Mexico regarding written form for arbitration agreements, to be submitted to the UNCITRAL Working Group on Commercial Arbitration

Subject to rule 19, any motion calling for a decision on the competence of the Conference to consider any matter, or to adopt a proposal, or an amendment submitted to it, shall be put to the vote before the matter is considered or a vote is taken on the proposal or amendment in question.

When two or more amendments to a proposal are moved, the Committee shall first vote on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom and so on until all amendments have been put to the vote.

When two or more amendments to a proposal are moved, the Committee shall first vote on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom, and so on, until all amendments have been put to the vote.

When two or more amendments to a proposal are moved, the Committee shall first vote on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom and so on until all amendments have been put to the vote.

When two or more amendments to a proposal are moved the Committee shall first vote on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom, and so on, until all amendments have been put to the vote.

When two or more amendments to a proposal are moved, the Committee shall first vote on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom and so on, until all amendments have been put to the vote.

While such a proposal was discussed in official forums, some participants insisted that more might be lost than gained in opening up the OST for amendment.

The perceived implications for trade, between Parties that had ratified that amendment and those that had not, led several Parties to express reservations over the proposal.

The Secretariat has received one formal proposal for amendment of the Protocol from the European Community, which calls for an expedited procedure for listing new ozone depleting substances in the Protocol.

When two or more amendments to a proposal are moved, the Committee shall first vote on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal and then on the amendment next furthest removed therefrom and so on until all the amendments have been put to the vote.

This amendment proposal was submitted to the Director General of IAEA by Austria on behalf of 24 States parties in May 2004.

The Austrian Minister for Foreign Affairs had submitted an amendment proposal to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, and a diplomatic conference for its adoption had been scheduled for July 2005.

Proposed amendment by the European Community for expedited amendment of the Montreal Protocol

The specific submission containing the proposal by the European Community for amendment, together with related background material submitted by the European Community, can be found in document UNEP OzL.Pro.17 8.

In our view, any reform proposal should entail an explicit amendment to the Charter preventing the granting of the veto beyond the current permanent members.

The specific submission containing the proposal by the European Community for amendment, together with related background material submitted by the European Community, can be found in document UNEP OzL.Pro.WG.1 25 4.

Draft decision XVII L Proposed amendment by the European Community for expedited amendment of the Montreal Protocol

The present rules may be amended by a decision of the Committee taken by a two thirds majority of the members present and voting, and at least twenty four (24) hours after the proposal for the amendment has been circulated, provided that the amendment is not inconsistent with the provisions of the Convention.

In response to the suggestion that Article 10 of the Vienna Convention already contained an expedited procedure for amendment of the Protocol, complete with the possibility for Parties to opt out, the representative of the United Kingdom explained that the Article covered annexes only whereas the proposal being tabled would allow for amendment of the body of the Protocol by Parties.

Taking into account the fact that states are responsible for documentation, marking and tracing MOTAPM in accordance with their national situations, the Chinese proposal has made amendment to Paragraph 31 (a) of the Coordinator's Paper.

Amendment

This proposal will tackle the OECD Commentary and comment on whether the amendment of the United Nations Commentary should be similar to, or different from, that of the OECD Commentary.

Reasons for the proposal

This was not the first time the proposal triggered protests demonstrations followed after Proposed Amendment number 215 00 was deemed admissible by the Chamber of Deputies constitution commission in March 2012.

Others questioned the feasibility of such a proposal, noting that it would entail modification of the terms of reference of the Human Rights Committee and thus an amendment to the Covenant.

Mr. Gopinathan (India) said that his delegation agreed with the proposal by the representative of Costa Rica and that it accepted the amendment proposed by the representative of the Russian Federation.

Proposal for a retention bonus

The representative of the Netherlands, speaking on behalf of the States Members of the United Nations that are members of the European Union, submitted the following proposal for amendment to the rules of procedure for the Conference of the Parties (CTOC COP 2005 L.13)

Revision and amendment

Amendment and revision

Article 1 Amendment

Amendment of Rules