However, the present claim is for damage to cultural heritage property and sites in all areas of Iran.

Claim No. 5000462 is for damage to cultural heritage resources claim No. 5000467 is for damage to livestock resources and claim No. 5000303 is for public health damage.

Personal injuries and damage to property

Claim No. 5000463 is for damage to or depletion of other resources and Claim 5000219 relates to damage to public health.

(a) damage means significant damage caused to persons, property or the environment and includes

Another 300,000 were injured or suffered property damage.

Without proof of actual damage, no claim should succeed.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.

(ii) loss of, or damage to, property, including property which forms part of the cultural heritage

An estimated 100 billion worth of property damage also occurred.

The first claim unit is for terrestrial damage the second claim unit is for damage to intertidal shoreline habitats the third claim unit is for damage to marine subtidal habitats the fourth claim unit is for losses of wildlife resources the fifth claim unit is for economic and ecological losses related to fisheries resources and the sixth claim unit is for two other compensatory projects.

The first claim unit is for damage to terrestrial resources the second claim unit is for damage to Kuwait's marine and coastal resources and the third claim unit is for the loss of groundwater resources.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000463 Claim No. 5000219 Public health Claim No. 5000219 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 19,861,782,707, for damage or risk of damage to public health resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Although there was property damage, there was no reaction from IDF.

Claim 5000468 is for expenses for remediation of damage to mudflats.

Part III, Section 35 Use of nuclear material causing injury to person or damage to property addresses offences relating to the Physical Protection Convention specifically injury to persons or damage to property.

One claim was for an unspecified property loss and the other was for property purchased in Iraq in 1993.

Claim 5000183 is for expenses and other losses related to public health damage.

Second claim unit Marine and coastal resources The second claim unit is for compensation for damage to marine and coastal resources.

The crimes tried by the court included kidnapping of foreigners, piracy, wilful damage to oil pipelines and installations, theft of public property by armed organizations or individuals, wilful damage of public property and hostage taking.

The violence resulted in a significant number of deaths, arson and damage to property.

This claim was initially part of Syria's fourth F4 instalment claim No. 5000457 for remediation of damage to agricultural and forestry resources.

Advocates of such agreements claim that they are needed to protect property rights.

(a) Reducing loss of life and property damage due to natural and human made disasters

Iraq contends that the estimates of impacted areas, damage percentages and duration of damage on which Iran bases its claim are invalid and unsubstantiated.

It captured our attention because it was so bad in terms of lives and property damage.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000462 Claim No. 5000467 Livestock resources Syria seeks compensation in the amount of USD 857,987,973, for damage to its livestock resources.

The claim is for losses during the period between the occurrence of the damage and the time when the damage has been or will be fully remediated.

The claim relates to damage to shoreline areas, wetlands, mangroves, intertidal and subtidal areas and coral reefs.

Tamper with property, no matter how ill gotten, and no investor will have confidence, they claim.

Expressing concern about the illicit traffic in cultural property and its damage to the cultural heritage of nations,

Expressing concern at the illicit traffic in cultural property and its damage to the cultural heritage of nations,

Such vehicles would be programmed to avoid crashes, leading to fewer deaths and injuries and less property damage.

The Panel considered that this part of the claim was for depletion of or damage to natural resources.

In the fourth F4 instalment, Saudi Arabia submitted a claim for the cost of remediating marine subtidal damage.

An estimated 100 billion worth of property damage also occurred, which in many countries eroded hard won development gains.

Expressing its concern about the illicit traffic of cultural property and its damage to the cultural heritage of nations,

Claim No. 5000460 is for compensation for damage to or depletion of terrestrial, marine and groundwater resources, including the expenses of compensatory projects proposed to address the damage or depletion.

As part of its claim for damage to shoreline resources, Kuwait also seeks monetary compensation for lost recreational opportunities.

For the purposes of the present claim, the Panel considers that, while soot might have caused some short term damage, Saudi Arabia has not provided sufficient evidence to quantify such damage.

Saudi Arabia notes that it did not claim the costs of restoration for these two items of damage in its claim No. 5000455, which was reviewed in the fourth F4 instalment.

Claim No. 5000460 Loss of natural resources Claim No. 5000460 comprises three claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 967,831,391, for loss of ecological and human services resulting from damage to or depletion of terrestrial, marine and groundwater resources.

(e) transboundary damage means damage caused to persons, property or the environment in the territory or in other places under the jurisdiction or control of a State other than the State of origin

On 23 December 1998, the secretariat severed the elements relating to environmental damage from claim 5000208 and assigned these elements to claim No. 5000309 which was transferred to the F4 claims category.

In the case of the restitution claim of the property in Letkov, the domestic courts held that the author had not proven that the current owners had acquired his property unlawfully.