Both nuclear weapon States and non nuclear weapon States were equally responsible for playing a role.

98) for nuclear weapon States.

Non nuclear weapon States demand unconditional assurances from nuclear weapon States that they will not use nuclear weapons under any circumstances.

All nuclear weapon states should undertake unconditionally not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non nuclear weapon states or nuclear weapon free zones, and conclude international legal instrument thereupon.

improvements in nuclear weapons by some nuclear weapon states.

Statements made by nuclear weapon States

Both nuclear weapon States and non nuclear weapon States must remain fully compliant with their obligations and commitments under the NPT.

Much is made of the bargain between nuclear weapon and non nuclear weapon States in the NPT.

They discourage non nuclear weapon States from opting for nuclear weapons.

If legally binding security assurances were given by the five nuclear weapon States to non nuclear weapon States, it would avoid unnecessary insecurity.

Pending its entry into force, the nuclear weapon States and other nuclear powers should maintain the moratorium on nuclear weapon test explosions.

(b) Nuclear weapon States should support the nuclear weapon free zones by signing relevant protocols for negative security assurances

Urge all States, particularly the nuclear weapon States, to fully cooperate with the five Central Asian States in implementing the Central Asian Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Treaty

While welcoming the steps nuclear weapon States have taken so far to reduce their nuclear arsenals, we encourage the nuclear weapon States to continue their efforts in this respect.

Nuclear weapon States parties cannot ignore the nuclear arsenals of non States parties to the NPT.

The Treaty envisages the construction of each pillar through a matching series of steps taken by both nuclear weapon states and non nuclear weapon states.

Urge all States, in particular the nuclear weapon States, to fully cooperate with the five Central Asian States in implementing the Central Asian Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Treaty

Moreover, these multinational approaches also include nuclear weapon States.

Further efforts by the nuclear weapon States to reduce their nuclear arsenals unilaterally

Non nuclear weapon states should be encouraged to continue to make efforts and advance proposals on establishing new nuclear weapon free zones.

There was also a need for multilateral dialogue between nuclear weapon and non nuclear weapon States aimed at general and complete disarmament.

14. Calls upon nuclear weapon States to undertake the necessary steps towards the seamless integration of all five nuclear weapon States into a process leading to the total elimination of nuclear weapons

We are disappointed that extraneous reasons are being employed by some nuclear weapon States to deny the rights of non nuclear weapon States to the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and technology.

They reiterate the agreement at the 2000 Review Conference that legally binding security assurances by the five nuclear weapon States to the non nuclear weapon States strengthen the nuclear non proliferation regime.

Regrettably, the nuclear weapon States had backtracked on their commitment.

It acknowledged the progress made in that regard but, together with other non nuclear weapon States, expected nuclear weapon States to continue giving effect to their disarmament obligations.

15. Calls upon the nuclear weapon States to undertake the necessary steps towards the seamless integration of all five nuclear weapon States into a process leading to the total elimination of nuclear weapons

Legally binding security assurances by the nuclear weapon States to the non nuclear weapon States parties to the NPT would significantly strengthen the nuclear non proliferation regime by eliminating incentives for pursuing capabilities.

Welcoming the significant unilateral reduction measures taken by other nuclear weapon States, including the closing down and dismantling of nuclear weapon related facilities,

The nuclear weapon states should respect the legal status of nuclear weapon free zones, and undertake corresponding obligations in a legally binding manner.

The implementation of NPT was a matter for nuclear and non nuclear weapon States alike.

The efforts of nuclear weapon States to reduce their nuclear arsenals should be duly appreciated.

Note with appreciation the support of all States, including the five nuclear weapon States, for the initiative of the five Central Asian States establishing a nuclear weapon free zone in the region

Taking note further of the unilateral declarations made by all the nuclear weapon States on their policies of non use or non threat of use of nuclear weapons against the non nuclear weapon States,

Taking note further of the unilateral declarations made by all the nuclear weapon States on their policies of non use or non threat of use of nuclear weapons against the non nuclear weapon States,

Considering that, until nuclear weapons cease to exist, it is imperative on the part of the nuclear weapon States to adopt measures that assure non nuclear weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Considering that, until nuclear weapons cease to exist, it is imperative on the part of the nuclear weapon States to adopt measures that assure non nuclear weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Considering that, until nuclear weapons cease to exist, it is imperative on the part of the nuclear weapon States to adopt measures that assure non nuclear weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Considering that, until nuclear weapons cease to exist, it is imperative on the part of the nuclear weapon States to adopt measures that assure non nuclear weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Considering that, until nuclear weapons cease to exist, it is imperative on the part of the nuclear weapon States to adopt measures that assure non nuclear weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Considering that, until nuclear weapons cease to exist, it is imperative on the part of the nuclear weapon States to adopt measures that assure non nuclear weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Considering that, until nuclear weapons cease to exist, it is imperative on the part of the nuclear weapon States to adopt measures that assure non nuclear weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons,

Ukraine believes that legally binding security assurances by the nuclear weapon States to the non nuclear weapon States parties to the NPT will significantly strengthen the nuclear non proliferation regime by eliminating plausible incentives for pursuing nuclear capabilities.

The Conference considers the establishment of nuclear weapon free zones as important contribution by non nuclear weapon States in promoting the nuclear non proliferation regime at regional levels.

Today, non nuclear weapon States are under constant nuclear threat because of the continued development of new types of nuclear weapons and nuclear threats by the super Power with the largest nuclear weapon stockpiles.