In social simulation, computers supports human reasoning activities by executing these mechanisms.

Deductive reasoning.

And you often hear another type of reasoning, inductive reasoning.

That's a funny kind of reasoning. Well, look who's reasoning.

Reasoning with Iran

That's inductive reasoning.

The PET covers three areas quantitative reasoning, verbal reasoning and the English language.

My reasoning is simple.

Inside Iran s Nuclear Reasoning

Same exact reasoning here.

Same exact reasoning here.

Anyway, that's the reasoning.

That is deductive reasoning.

My reasoning is the following.

So this is deductive reasoning.

Try reasoning first, says I.

Mathematics is rightly considered the pinnacle of human reasoning, but we now know that even mathematics has its limitations.

Other schools of CBR and closely allied fields emerged in the 1980s, which directed at topics such as legal reasoning, memory based reasoning (a way of reasoning from examples on massively parallel machines), and combinations of CBR with other reasoning methods.

John Marshall explained the Court's reasoning.

That's an interesting line of reasoning.

Such reasoning proves you are possessed.

That's an example of consequentialist moral reasoning. consequentialist moral reasoning locates morality in the consequences of an act.

The reasoning behind the tests seemed unimpeachable.

This reasoning resonates with the US public.

Australia accepts the reasoning behind this assessment.

A part of the majority's reasoning was

Which ones, if any, use deductive reasoning?

So statement one is definitely deductive reasoning.

You find some flaw in this reasoning?

The same reasoning applies to the Greek crisis.

That reasoning is familiar, but is it correct?

Logicker picks up the line of reasoning saying

We are not good at reasoning with uncertainty.

So therefore this is also sound deductive reasoning.

So both one and two use deductive reasoning.

Context is at the center of historical reasoning.

And, increasingly, the reasoning behind such forecasts seems persuasive.

The reasoning in the French sources raises certain questions.

The same reasoning applies to the more complex problem.

They make errors of logic in reasoning with uncertainty.

As a result, analogical reasoning both shapes and distorts policy.

Others include shura (consultation), ijtihad (independent reasoning), and ijma (consensus).

In this connection, the following reasoning has to be made.

If you don't like my reasoning, don't take my classes.

So, the line or reasoning would go something like this