Some of these identifiers are included in the claim form submitted by the claimant the remaining data is taken from the evidence provided by a claimant either in the original claim or in response to claim development notifications.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The seventh claim file was not transmitted to Iraq as the claimant objected to such transmission.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Fifth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 51,075 for project implementation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

Iraq also provided comments on this claim.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Summary of recommended awards for the claims of Iran 58

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Iraq alleged that the claimant did not object to the confiscation of his stock by Iraqi authorities and that the claimant may have been a collaborator with Iraqi forces.

Overlapping claim

UNCC claim No. 3011623.

UNCC claim No. 1810440.

Accordingly, the claim for loss of profits on contracts is time barred and the Panel has considered the original claim for the loss of receivables.

The Governing Council approved the recommendation and the award has been paid to the Kuwaiti claimant.

The Governing Council approved the recommendation and the award has been paid to the Kuwaiti claimant.

The claim to sovereignty over the Malvinas Islands has constitutional weight

We call on the international community to demand the unconditional lifting of that embargo.

The Panel recommended that the award of compensation made to the E4 claimant, who proved his entitlement to compensation, be maintained and that the overpayment made to the category C claimant under the original category C award be corrected.

Accordingly, this claim was not transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for substantive review rather, the claim fails.

UNCC claim No. 3012161

UNCC claim No. 3011290

UNCC claim No. 3011328

UNCC claim No. 3010941

UNCC claim No. 3011574

UNCC claim No. 3011731

UNCC claim No. 3012801

UNCC claim No. 3010785

UNCC claim No. 3012091

UNCC claim No. 3010883

UNCC claim No. 3012104

UNCC claim No. 3011345

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012105, the claimant did not include audited accounts in his original claim submission.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

The Governing Council approved this recommendation and the award was paid to the Kuwaiti claimant.

Where the third party was unable to verify the documents proffered by the claimant or provided statements inconsistent with the information provided by the claimant, the Panel finds the evidence submitted by the claimant to be unreliable.

It should be noted that the excess amounts previously awarded in respect of the claim will be deducted from the total recommended compensation in respect of the matching category D claim.

This claim is the deferred portion of claim No. 5000259 relating to remediation of coastal mudflats.

However, where a claimant confirms that the claim is only for his or her equity interest in the company, and does not tie the equity claim to any specific asset lost as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, the Panel considers that generally such a claim is not compensable.