1.63 Figure 2 shows the 2006 2007 regular budget broken down into categories of expenditure.

Figure 3 below illustrates these differences.

Figure 3.

Figure 1 illustrates the numbers of Parties that reported measures in the various sectors and the names of the Parties are indicated in table 4.

Figure 3.

Figure 1. Time frame of reporting and reviews according to existing mandates

Figure 2 below shows the distribution of the project proposals by emission sector.

Freezing, seizure and confiscation of proceeds derived from drug trafficking or other serious crimes, 1998 2000, 2000 2002 and 2002 2004

Figure 2 shows the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution for the speeds of the atoms in four noble gases.

Figure 2 shows the breakdown between new (net) transfers and debt forgiveness.

Figure IX presents a comparison of the results of the three reporting periods in this area.

Figure 1 Contributions received, by regional group

Figure 1 Evolution of per capita GDP and acute poverty (1990 2004)

Figure I shows the Don Quijote mission with its two components, Sancho and Hidalgo, on top of the Soyuz Fregat launcher upper stage.

Figure 1.

Given the exception to the suspension of recruitment regarding safety and security personnel, and as a result of efforts to expeditiously fill those security posts, the overall number of vacant General Service regular budget posts was reduced to 315 posts as at the end of July 2005.

The results are shown in table 1.

of the total resources mobilized by UNDP in 2004. Figure 7 represents the top 10 donors that contributed to other donor resources in 2004.

The minimum information requirements are outlined in A4.3.

Amend the text for the hazard statements to read as follows

Figure 1 Regular Budget by Category of Expenditure

Table 4 provides a cumulative performance assessment under sub goal 1.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 21.1 below.

Figure 1. CO2 Emissions per Capita

Figure 1 Status of ratification of the amendments to the Montreal Protocol

Figure 1 Eligibility for type (ii) project activities

Figure 1 Aid provided to Africa, 1990 2003

Table 1 shows the measures most commonly reported in the energy sector, with regional detail.

In the second sentence of the paragraph, replace specific reproductive toxicity with an adverse effect on sexual function and fertility or on development .

Figure 1 Technical cooperation funding (USD'000)

Chart 3 shows the rate of implementation of critical recommendations issued since 1 July 2000.

Outputs reflect deliverables and do not include non quantifiable results, such as those related to correct interpretation and application of legislative mandates, strategy planning or other quality related aspects for the successful conduct of the governing bodies.

Figure 1 below includes a scheme for the organizational structure for regional assessments.

The allocation of resources to the various geographical and functional areas (see Chart 1) reflects UNHCR's operational priorities.

A regional analysis of the responses from those countries reporting in both the second and third periods shows a significant increase in the proportion of countries in the Americas and Asia (see figure IV).

Number of Parties reporting on key vulnerable sectors

Population range of non Annex I Parties

Programme assistance expenditures increased steadily in the last MTSP period, reaching 1,344 million in 2004 (see figure II).

Figure 1. Number of Parties that reported measures in the various sectors

Figure 1 Proposed organisationization structure and activity flow leading to completion of the assessment reports

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

In NOTES 1 and 2 under Table 3.7.1, insert the following phrase after toxicant , in the first sentence or substance classified in the additional category for effects on or via lactation .

The value formula_22 can be seen as a yield offset , as shown in figure 1.

1.69 Figure 4 shows the 2006 2007 regular budget by programme activity.