The Appeals Chamber affirmed in part and reversed in part the Trial Chamber's decision.

This is necessarily a judicial decision under the jurisdiction of the indictment division of the Appeals Court.

The Federal Court of Appeal ruling may be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The imposition of counsel was appealed and ultimately reversed in part by the Appeals Chamber.

10 Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Regarding Temporal Jurisdiction , 29 July 2004.

3 Decision on Mugiraneza's Interlocutory Appeal against the Decision of the Trial Chamber on Exclusion of Evidence , 15 July 2004.

Furthermore, the author cited the Constitutional Court ruling of 26 June 1999, which established that a conviction by an appeal court following an acquittal by the court of first instance did not violate the right to review.

9 Decision on Joseph Nzabirinda's Notice of Appeal , 28 January 2005.

The Appeals Chamber overturned the Trial Chamber's decision inasmuch as it related to the modalities, which it found relegated the appellant to a secondary role in the trial.

Despite the court's decision to lift the ban on Azamn, the Omani government has continued to target the newspaper.

On 7 September 2004, an appeal against the decision of the Central District of Minsk Court was rejected.

On these points, the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal and gave additional reasoning on the foreseeability of the damages.

(d) Grounds of appeal before the United Nations Appeals Tribunal

Judges Van der Reep and Veger, who rendered judgement in the Court of Appeal case, also sit on the Utrecht Regional Court.

11 Decision on Validity of Appeal Pursuant to Rule 72 (E) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence , 30 September 2004.

5 Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Regarding Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise to the Crime of Genocide , 22 October 2004.

(b) The Court of Appeal

the right to appeal.

Right of appeal

He won the appeal.

Justice Crennan dismissed the appeal.

Appeals and Subsequent Actions

The plaintiff could utilize the same appeal procedure as is applicable to ordinary civil litigation against a judgement refusing to grant enforcement of an arbitral award.

The complainant explains the omission in his application for review partly by saying that he was ashamed, partly by saying that he feared the consequences of his apostasy, and lastly by saying that he did not realize the importance of the point until after the Commission handed down its decision on 5 August 2002.

The Committee recalled that even if a system of appeal is not automatic, the right to appeal under article 14, paragraph 5, imposed on the State party a duty substantially to review, both on the basis of sufficiency of the evidence and of the law, the conviction and sentence.

That book seizure had been the only such seizure, and was under appeal in the Court of Appeals.

On 13 December 2002, the case was heard by the high court of the Guadalajara de Buga judicial district, which rejected the complainant's application.

They have been and will continue to result in increased efficiency of appeals proceedings before the Appeals Chamber.

Singapore Singapore Court of Appeal

In the Appeals Chamber four judgements were delivered.

The Appeals Chamber denied leave to appeal.

The Court of Appeal, please.

The State party concludes that, given the reasoning behind it, the decision by the Administrative Court of Appeal does nothing to strengthen the complainant's position before the Committee.

Under legislative review, he highlighted the need to address the finding of the Appeal Court that the Fair Trading Commission (FTC) was in contravention of the principles of natural justice.

On 13 April 1999, the High Court upheld the District Court's decision, and on 20 August 1999, the Supreme Court dismissed the author's appeal.

2.3 This decision was appealed through a request for reversal of the tribunal's decision, which was rejected on 13 May 1997 by the Superior Court of Justice in Murcia.

On 19 November 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application and on 24 December 1999, rejected his appeal from the Court of Appeal.

3.9 The author contends that by summarily dismissing his appeal, which contained questions of law, the Supreme Court denied him his right to have his conviction reviewed by a higher tribunal according to law (art. 14, para.

The appeal was heard by the same three judges who had convicted him and was dismissed on 17 July 2003.

He does not say to where he appealed it.

On 28 January 2005, the Appeals Chamber disposed of Nzabirinda's Notice of Appeal of the Trial Chamber's Decision on Joseph Nzabirinda's Motion to Set Aside the Registrar's Decision to Withhold the Amount Owed to Him in Meeting the Cost of His Defence .

Pre appeal procedures were completed during the reporting period, with a substantial number of pre appeal decisions being issued by the Appeals Chamber.

1972 2001 Advocate of the High Court of Pakistan

The Court of Appeal based its decision on the following grounds.

In the appeal to the Supreme Court, his claim was similarly dismissed.